§ discipline
‹ Browse decisions

Timothy Charles Elkins

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number11429/2015
Date01/01/2015
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
CostsGBP 55,676
Dishonesty foundYes

Timothy Charles Elkins, a solicitor at Johnson and Gaunt, implemented four SDLT mitigation schemes (Unlimited Company, Option, Crystal and Jovian) across 80 conveyancing transactions, avoiding approximately £1.3m in stamp duty. The Tribunal found he failed to disclose the schemes to lender clients, failed to act in purchasers' best interests, acted where there was a significant risk of conflict, failed to have proper referral agreements, kept poor accounting records and misused client funds. The Tribunal made express findings of dishonesty in respect of three allegations: backdating Crystal Scheme conditional contracts, submitting misleading SDLT1 forms to HMRC claiming relief when no valid scheme was in place, and failing to disclose full and accurate information to ITS/HMRC during an HMRC enquiry. Applying the Twinsectra test, dishonesty was found on both objective and subjective limbs. Absent exceptional circumstances, the Tribunal struck him off the Roll and ordered him to pay agreed proceedings costs of £55,675.60 plus investigation costs subject to detailed assessment.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Deliberate and repeated actions
  • Conduct continued over three years and persisted for a year after the March 2012 Budget
  • Element of pre-planning
  • Element of concealment of wrongdoing (Allegation 1.9)
  • Position of trust with 30 years' experience operating at partner level
  • Ought to have known he was in material breach of obligations

Mitigating factors:

  • Previously unblemished career
  • Impressive character references
  • Limited insight through admissions in Answer and evidence
  • Co-operation with the investigation
  • Dishonesty was a cluster of acts precipitated by the March 2012 Budget rather than a propensity for dishonesty

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/11429/