§ discipline
‹ Browse decisions

P J Lawson & Another

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number9529/2006
Date01/01/2006
OutcomeS.43 Order (clerks), Suspend - Indefinite

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Failures, Others

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionSuspension
CostsGBP 21,000
Dishonesty foundNo

Mr Lawson, a solicitor, was found to have repeatedly breached the Solicitors Practice Rules by acting in numerous conflict-of-interest situations: lending client estate/trust funds to his son's property company Ventroday and to other clients, and selling estate properties to himself, his wife, mother-in-law and his son's company, as well as accepting bequests from clients without ensuring independent advice and failing to supervise his clerk. The Law Society expressly did not allege dishonesty and the Tribunal found Mr Lawson honest and acting with integrity, but his conduct left him wide open to suspicion of dishonesty and was wholly wrong. He was suspended indefinitely and ordered to pay £21,000 costs (reduced from £35,000 claimed). The Second Respondent clerk had a Section 43 Order made, effective from 15 June 2007, with no costs order against her, the Tribunal finding she was competent and honest and bore little blame having acted as instructed.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Repeated breaches of the Practice Rules over time
  • Closed mind to requirements of modern practice and inability to recognise wrongdoing even at hearing
  • Previous disciplinary finding in 1990 (though long ago and on a different issue)
  • Lent client trust funds to son's company and sold estate properties to family/son's company at probate value (potential disadvantage to estates)

Mitigating factors:

  • No finding of dishonesty; Tribunal found Mr Lawson honest and acted with integrity
  • No client suffered loss; all loans repaid with interest
  • No client complaints; clients confirmed satisfaction
  • Full cooperation - made all files available and concealed nothing
  • No deficiencies found in books of account
  • Limited means (state and small private pension)
  • Returned bequest after FIU Report (declined by beneficiary)

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/9529/