Kwame Agyekum Siaw
Allegation / charges
Breaches, Solicitors' Accounts Rules
Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision
The Respondent, a partner at Mountain Partnership Solicitors, acted on an immigration/judicial review matter for Client K, provided his personal bank account details and received £500 into his personal account on 20 August 2015, failing to account for it (or part of it, beyond £205 disbursements) to the firm, breaching Principles 2 and 6 and Rule 14.1. He also told the SRA in a 22 May 2017 email that he had not received payment of costs into his personal account, which was untrue/misleading, breaching Principles 2, 6 and 7. The SDT found the allegations proved but did NOT find dishonesty, imposing a £10,000 fine plus £3,371 costs. The SRA appealed; the High Court allowed the appeal, substituted an express finding of dishonesty, quashed the fine and ordered the Respondent be struck off the Roll.
Duties found breached:
- Integrity
- Uphold public trust in the profession
- No improper use of client money
- Cooperate openly with regulators
Aggravating factors:
- Clients (Mr and Mrs K) were vulnerable at the material time
- Experienced solicitor (over 15 years) and a partner/COLP at the firm
Mitigating factors:
- Motivated by a desire to help a friend rather than personal gain
- Conduct of short duration (about four weeks)
- Otherwise unblemished career with no prior disciplinary findings
- Genuine contrition and offer to refund the money
Duties engaged
- Honesty
- Integrity
- No bribery or improper gifts
- Personal probity and fitness to practise
- Uphold public trust in the profession
- No unlawful discrimination or harassment
- Act in the client's best interests
- Advise objectively, not a mere conduit
- Complaints procedure and handling
- No improper use of client money
- Cooperate openly with regulators