Priyank Tanwar
Allegation / charges
Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, SRA Principles 2019
Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision
Mr Tanwar, a self-employed consultant solicitor with conduct of private family law (Children Act) proceedings, attended a final contested hearing on 24 August 2023 by telephone from Munich, Germany, despite a court order dated 27 July 2023 requiring in-person attendance. He repeatedly told Recorder O'Grady he was at his firm's office in Ealing, London, when he was actually abroad, only being corrected by opposing counsel. The Tribunal found both allegations proved, including dishonesty under the Ivey test, finding he knew he was not in the UK and deliberately misled the court, and rejecting his explanation that he was conveying his office location to establish his credentials. He also failed to attend in person or arrange a suitable representative. Finding no exceptional circumstances, the Tribunal ordered that he be struck off the Roll of Solicitors.
Duties found breached:
- Avoid wasting the court's time
- Honesty
- Integrity
- No improper communication with the court
- Non-discriminatory acceptance and cab-rank
- Not mislead the court
- Uphold public trust in the profession
Aggravating factors:
- Misleading the court, regarded as one of the most serious offences an advocate/litigator can commit
- Conduct occurred in sensitive family proceedings concerning the welfare of children at risk of harm
- Repeated/persistent misleading exchanges (misled the court on at least four occasions)
- Caused considerable inconvenience and disruption to the efficient management of the court day
Codes & rules applied
Duties engaged
- Act only on proper, lawful instructions
- Advise on alternatives, settlement and outcome
- Avoid wasting the court's time
- Cease acting on client perjury or disobedience
- Client-care and engagement terms
- Client confidentiality
- Competence
- Complaints procedure and handling
- Comply with and respect court orders
- Comply with rules of foreign jurisdictions
- Continuity and handover of representation
- Cooperate openly with regulators
- Costs and fee transparency to client
- Diligence and timeliness
- Disclose adverse law to the court
- Disclose material information to client
- Disclose referrals, commissions and benefits
- Fair dealing with unrepresented parties
- Fair, reasonable and lawful fees
- Full disclosure on ex parte applications
- Good faith and courtesy to colleagues
- Handle inadvertently received material
- Hold a current practising certificate
- Honour professional undertakings
- Keep client informed and respond promptly
- Maintain competence and CPD
- Manage conflict arising mid-matter
- No abuse of process or coercive powers
- No acting against a former client
- No baseless or threatened misconduct report
- No conflict between current clients
- No direct dealing with represented party
- No improper benefit, loan or bequest
- No improper communication with the court
- No improper fee-sharing or partnership
- No improper questioning of witnesses
- No improper solicitation or touting
- Non-discriminatory acceptance and cab-rank
- No obstruction or victimisation of reporters
- No own-interest conflict
- No payments to witnesses on evidence
- No personal opinion or familiarity with court
- No prejudicial publicity for pending cases
- No standing bail or surety for client
- No taking unfair advantage
- No tampering with or coaching witnesses
- Not mislead the court
- Not mislead third parties or opponents
- Not misrepresent regulated status
- Pay instructed practitioners and agents
- Professional indemnity insurance
- Proper basis for allegations
- Proper termination and return of instructions
- Prosecutorial duty of disclosure
- Prosecutorial fairness and impartiality
- Protect capacity and vulnerable clients
- Protect legal professional privilege
- Report serious misconduct of others
- Safeguard documents and limit liens
- Self-report to the regulator
- Truthful, non-misleading advertising