§ discipline
‹ Back

Neil Lawrence Jacobsen

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number11240/2014
Date01/01/2014
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Client Money, Others, Solicitors' Accounts Rules

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
CostsGBP 7,000
Dishonesty foundYes

The Respondent, a solicitor and member of Caldicotts Solicitors LLP, misappropriated £60,306.34 from client account via 13 cheques between July 2011 and December 2012, paying funds to herself, her spouse, and creditors, while concealing this through false ledger entries, false letters to beneficiaries and false copy cheques on client files. She admitted all allegations including dishonesty. The Tribunal found dishonesty proved under the Twinsectra test and found no exceptional circumstances per Sharma. The Respondent did not attend the hearing (hospitalised with pneumonia) but asked it proceed in her absence. She was struck off the Roll and ordered to pay costs of £7,000.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Misappropriation of £60,306.34 of client money over a period exceeding 17 months
  • Creation of false letters, false copy cheques and false ledger entries to conceal withdrawals
  • Course of conduct that was frequent and repeated, not isolated
  • A considerable amount of the money misappropriated was applied for her own benefit
  • Only began repaying when misconduct was discovered

Mitigating factors:

  • Full and early admissions including dishonesty
  • Cooperated with the Applicant throughout the investigation
  • No previous disciplinary matters or complaints
  • Repaid the vast majority of the shortfall, partly from sale of her home
  • Claimed actions partly motivated by attempt to keep the firm afloat and protect staff and clients
  • Inexperience and pressure as recently qualified sole responsible member for firm finances
  • Adverse impact on her family

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/11240-2/