§ discipline
‹ Back

Gail Evans

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number11285/2014
Date01/01/2014
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Criminal Convictions

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
CostsGBP 2,500
Dishonesty foundNo

Gail Evans, a criminal defence solicitor admitted in 2002, faced allegations arising from a March 2011 conviction for driving with excess alcohol, failure to disclose that conviction to the SRA until October 2013, and a June 2013 conviction for driving with excess alcohol, driving whilst disqualified and no insurance. The Tribunal found all allegations proved, including that she acted without integrity in failing to report the 2011 conviction and in committing the 2013 offences. No dishonesty was alleged or found - only lack of integrity. Given the seriousness, the repeated nature of the offending, and the need to protect the reputation of the profession, the Tribunal struck her off the Roll of Solicitors and ordered her to pay agreed costs of £2,500, not enforceable without leave of the Tribunal save for the registration of a charge over property.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Misconduct involved commission of criminal offences
  • Conduct was repeated (fourth conviction for driving with excess alcohol)
  • Failure to report 2011 conviction for over two years included an element of concealment
  • Driving whilst disqualified and without insurance were very serious aggravating factors
  • As a criminal lawyer she was particularly aware of repercussions of such offences

Mitigating factors:

  • Progress made since 2013 in addressing alcohol problems with ATR and voluntary engagement
  • Early admission of the offences themselves
  • Co-operation with the SRA during the investigation
  • Difficult family and personal circumstances and episodes of depression
  • Competent solicitor supported by positive references

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/11285/