§ discipline
‹ Back

John James Hobart Burden

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number10993/2012
Date01/01/2012
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Criminal Convictions

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
CostsGBP 1,000
Dishonesty foundNo

The respondent, a retired solicitor still holding a practising certificate, was convicted on 20 September 2011 at Croydon Magistrates' Court of 5 counts of making indecent photographs/pseudo-photographs of a child (585 indecent images accessed over 7-8 months), in breach of Rule 1.06 of the Solicitors' Code of Conduct 2007. He was sentenced to 9 months custody suspended for 24 months, 100 hours unpaid work, a forfeiture order, a Sex Offender Programme, an indefinite SOPO and 10 years on the Sex Offenders Register. The Tribunal found the allegation substantiated, noting personal failings and a considerable lack of integrity, and struck him off the Roll. He was ordered to pay costs of £1,000 (claim of £1,296.90 reduced).

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Conviction involved exploitation and abuse of children
  • 152 of 585 images fell within the more serious categories (levels 2 to 5)
  • Made repeated initial denials to police, including claiming images were of persons over 18 and claiming research purposes - described by judge as 'woeful and highly disingenuous'
  • Conduct undermined public trust in the profession

Mitigating factors:

  • Pleaded guilty at the earliest opportunity before the Magistrates' Court
  • Images were for personal use, no moving images, not retained or distributed
  • Majority of images (432) were at level 1 (erotic posing with no sexual activity)

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/10993/