§ discipline
‹ Back

Mumba Chakulya

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number12670/2024
Date09/09/2025
OutcomeNot Proved/Dismissed

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, SRA Principles 2019

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionDismissed
Dishonesty foundNo

A newly qualified solicitor at Goody Burrett LLP faced three allegations of providing false information about work undertaken on two clients' debt-recovery matters (Client A and Client B), including issuing an allegedly false invoice. The Tribunal found Allegations 1.1 and 1.2 (Client A) not proved, accepting the Respondent was a credible witness who genuinely believed she had issued proceedings via MCOL using a personal Gmail account; the court could not search records beyond three years, and the managing partner conceded she could not rule out that the work had been done. The Tribunal expressly found the Respondent had not acted dishonestly. Allegation 1.3 (Client B) was dismissed following a successful submission of no case to answer, with concerns over the reliability and truthfulness of the supervising solicitor's evidence. All allegations were dismissed and no sanction was imposed.

Mitigating factors:

  • Newly qualified solicitor with no prior litigation experience
  • Inadequate supervision and chaotic operational/management structure at the Firm
  • Genuine belief that proceedings had been issued
  • Credible and consistent witness

Codes & rules applied

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/12670/