§ discipline
‹ Back

Elizabeth Jane Radcliffe

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number12700/2024
Date22/08/2025
OutcomeSuspend - Fixed Period

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Client Money, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2019, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionSuspension
Suspension12 months
Dishonesty foundNo

Elizabeth Jane Radcliffe, an experienced sole practitioner and COLP/COFA/MLRO at Rowe Radcliffe, admitted four allegations resolved by agreed outcome on the papers. She caused/allowed a minimum client account cash shortage of £122,263.25 (caused by incorrect payments to beneficiaries, a third party and duplicate cost transfers), failed to maintain accurate/compliant account records, failed to complete client account reconciliations (last reconciliation 30 June 2019 despite the firm trading until 31 August 2021), and failed to engage/cooperate with the SRA and Legal Ombudsman. The SRA had intervened in March 2023. The Tribunal found high culpability and a lack of integrity (Principle 5), but expressly found no dishonesty was alleged or found. It determined suspension was warranted but strike-off was not. The Respondent received a 12-month suspension from 3 July 2025, with practising conditions to take effect after suspension (no sole practice, no holding client money, no client account signatory, no COLP/COFA roles, employment only as approved by the SRA). No order for costs was made.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Misconduct continued over a significant period of time
  • Respondent had previously received an SRA letter of advice (23 November 2019) regarding Accounts Rules compliance yet continued to make errors
  • High level of culpability as experienced solicitor and COLP/COFA ultimately responsible
  • Continued making payments without knowing whether sufficient funds were held to meet client liabilities
  • Harm caused to the reputation of the profession

Codes & rules applied

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/12700/