§ discipline
‹ Back

Lloyd O. Sheckleford

JurisdictionJamaica
BodyGeneral Legal Council — Disciplinary Committee (GLC)
Professionattorney
Case number163 of 2006
DateApril 26, 2014
OutcomeFined

Allegation / charges

Fined | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered April 26, 2014. View PDF JUDGEMENT OF THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE GENERAL LEGAL COUNCIL COMPLAINT NO: 163/2006 BETWEEN EILEEN BOXILL COMPLAINANT AND LLOYD SHECKLEFORD RESPONDENT PANEL: Pamela Benka-Coker, Q.C. Charles Piper David …

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionFine
FineJMD 350,000
CostsJMD 100,000
Dishonesty foundNo

Attorney Lloyd Sheckleford, admitted in 1977 and in private practice, failed to pay practising certificate fees from 1984 until the complaint was filed in July 2006 (22 years) while continuing to practise without a practising certificate. After the complaint, he made payments totalling $135,000. The panel found, beyond reasonable doubt, that he was guilty of serious professional misconduct in breach of section 5(2) of the Legal Profession Act and several canons. The panel imposed a fine of $350,000 and costs of $100,000 payable to the General Legal Council.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Failure to pay practising certificate fees for 22 years
  • Deliberate continued practice without a practising certificate

Mitigating factors:

  • Attorney was permitted to practise for many years without his practising certificate before proceedings commenced
  • Attorney made payments of outstanding practising certificate fees after the complaint was laid

Documents

Source: https://www.generallegalcouncil.org/judgement/lloyd-o-sheckleford-complaint-no-163-of-2006/