§ discipline
‹ Browse decisions

Christopher Ricketts

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number7018/1995
Date01/01/1995
OutcomeS.43 Order (clerks)

Allegation / charges

Others

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionConditions
CostsGBP 627
Dishonesty foundNo

The respondent, an outdoor clerk (not a solicitor) employed by Rafiq & Co., twice failed to notify clients of hearing dates, leading to wasted costs orders against his firm. He also told a judge on oath that he was a trainee solicitor when he was an outdoor clerk. The Tribunal found he had misled the court (a serious matter) but accepted he was endeavouring to assist and was "put on the spot"; it made no express finding of dishonesty. A Section 43 order controlling his employment within the profession was made and he was ordered to pay fixed costs of £627.45.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Misled the court on oath, which the Tribunal regarded as a serious matter

Mitigating factors:

  • Respondent apologised and said he had learned a salutary lesson
  • Did not have sole responsibility for the matter; firm had heavy workload (four fee earners handling some four thousand files)
  • Felt he lacked appropriate support, supervision and guidance
  • Had panicked when put on the spot before the judge
  • Around ten years' experience as an outdoor clerk; had worked to improve himself
  • Married man with two children
  • Attended before the Tribunal to explain his position

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/7018/