§ discipline
‹ Browse decisions

Michael Brendan O'Maoileoin

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number11702/2017
Date01/01/2017
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Breaches

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
Dishonesty foundYes

Michael Brendan O'Maoileoin, an experienced solicitor at Hugh James, failed to diarise and attend a summary judgment hearing, leading to judgment against his client. He concealed this failure and, when asked by Genus Law for a witness statement in support of an application to set aside the judgment, signed a statement dated 24 March 2015 containing two untruths (that documents had been misfiled and that the matter only came to his attention upon service of the winding up petition). He knew the statement was false and misleading. He admitted allegation 1, breaches of Principles 2 and 6, failure to achieve Outcome 5.1, and dishonesty. The Tribunal found all proven beyond reasonable doubt. It rejected arguments of exceptional circumstances (work/personal pressure, regulatory delay, character references, and the period he continued practising), finding the conduct was deliberate dishonesty rather than mere panic, and ordered that he be struck off the Roll.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Deliberate dishonesty sustained over a period of time (7 months)
  • Misleading the court via a witness statement bearing a statement of truth - regarded as among the most serious offences
  • Multiple opportunities to put matters right which were not taken
  • Highly experienced solicitor with direct control and responsibility
  • Motivation to protect his own professional reputation; sole beneficiary; exposed the Firm to reputational risk
  • Admission of dishonesty only came after he was effectively caught out

Mitigating factors:

  • Previously unblemished career
  • Made admissions and offered a meaningful apology
  • Strong character references spanning his career
  • Cooperated and ultimately admitted the allegations
  • Single client/matter affected; no quality issues on other files

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/11702/