§ discipline
‹ Back

George S Ross

JurisdictionScotland
BodyScottish Solicitors' Discipline Tribunal (SSDT)
Professionsolicitor — George S Ross, represented by Brodies LLP, 58 Morrison Street, Edinburgh
Date22nd Aug 2023
AppealNo Appeal

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionReprimand
Dishonesty foundNo

The Scottish Solicitors' Discipline Tribunal found George S Ross guilty of professional misconduct in cumulo for breaches relating to the 2013 conveyance of a trust property where he took instructions solely via one executor (brother 'X') and never contacted or advised the Secondary Complainer (another executor). He breached Rules B4.2, B1.5.1, B1.4.1 and B1.9.1 by failing to provide a letter of engagement, failing to obtain proper instructions, failing to act in the best interests of the Secondary Complainer and failing to communicate effectively. The Tribunal expressly found no dishonesty and no personal gain. Given his 38-year unblemished career, cooperation and insight, the Tribunal censured him and awarded expenses to the Complainers (to be taxed), with publicity ordered and brother 'X' anonymised.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Unusual/unorthodox transaction with red flags (no price paid, no missives concluded, purchaser changed, pressure to complete quickly)
  • No contact whatsoever with the Secondary Complainer from instruction to settlement
  • Failure to provide advice to the Secondary Complainer about consequences of signing the disposition

Mitigating factors:

  • 38-year unblemished legal career with no previous findings
  • No dishonesty or personal/financial gain
  • Cooperation with disciplinary process and entering into Joint Minute
  • Expressed regret and demonstrated insight
  • Respondent himself was also misled by brother 'X' / a victim of fraud
  • Retired in 2022 and undertook no legal work since
  • Conduct occurred over a short space of time and related to only one transaction

Documents

Source: https://www.ssdt.org.uk/findings/law-society-v-george-s-ross/