§ discipline
‹ Back

Simon Paget-Brown

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number12551/2024
Date13/09/2024
OutcomeSuspend - Fixed Period

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Code of Conduct 2011, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Failures, Solicitors Accounts Rules 1998, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2019, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionSuspension
Suspension12 months
Costs 15,000
Dishonesty foundNo

By an Agreed Outcome, solicitor Simon Paget-Brown admitted all allegations arising from his conduct while sole practitioner of Paget-Brown (UK) and sole director of its successor body. He participated in or facilitated transactions for Wraith Capital that bore the hallmarks of advance fee fraud (admitted to be reckless), acted in transactions for a company of which he was a director (own interest conflict), failed to perform an undertaking within an agreed timescale (satisfied only after ~30 months), allowed the client account to be used as a banking facility, and failed to maintain accounting records or obtain accountant's reports for three years. The Tribunal found his culpability high but determined that strike-off was not justified. He was suspended for 12 months with practising restrictions thereafter (including a bar on giving undertakings and holding client money) and ordered to pay agreed costs.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Recklessness (admitted) in participating in/facilitating advance fee fraud transactions
  • Very experienced solicitor with direct control/responsibility for the misconduct
  • Was COLP and COFA at the Firm
  • Serious and repeated nature of misconduct
  • Conduct caused Company C to lose £212,800
  • Aware that Mr Donaldson was a convicted fraudster
  • Full admission made only a day before the substantive hearing

Mitigating factors:

  • Some genuine insight shown by admitting the misconduct
  • Misconduct arose in part from deception by a third party (Mr Donaldson)
  • Eventually satisfied the undertaking

Codes & rules applied

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/12551/