Philip John Burbidge
Allegation / charges
Breaches, Code of Conduct 2011, Dishonesty, Lack of Integrity, SRA Principles 2011
Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision
Philip John Burbidge, a consultant solicitor with 25 years' experience, was found to have dishonestly misled clients in a 4 November 2016 letter by stating that pre-action protocol letters had been sent when they had not. He also recklessly failed to comply with Consent and Unless Orders, leading to his clients' construction dispute claims being struck out with adverse costs orders, and failed to seek client instructions, including notifying clients of a without prejudice costs offer a day after it had expired. The Tribunal made an express finding of dishonesty under the Ivey test and found high culpability and harm. The Respondent did not engage with proceedings and offered no mitigation. Finding no exceptional circumstances, the Tribunal struck him off the Roll and ordered costs of £16,624.56.
Duties found breached:
- Integrity
- Uphold public trust in the profession
- Act in the client's best interests
- Non-discriminatory acceptance and cab-rank
Aggravating factors:
- Dishonesty found
- Misconduct persisted over a period approaching 2 years
- Conduct indicative of concealment
- No genuine insight or admissions
- Failed to co-operate with the Regulator
- High culpability and high harm
Mitigating factors:
- No previous disciplinary findings
Codes & rules applied
Duties engaged
- Honesty
- Integrity
- No bribery or improper gifts
- Personal probity and fitness to practise
- Uphold public trust in the profession
- No unlawful discrimination or harassment
- Act in the client's best interests
- Protect legal professional privilege
- Keep client informed and respond promptly
- Non-discriminatory acceptance and cab-rank
- Hold a current practising certificate