COLIN ROBERT McKERLIE
Allegation / charges
Struck Off the Roll of Practitioners
Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision
The Legal Practitioners Complaints Committee sought removal of Colin Robert McKerlie from the Roll based on his criminal convictions for unlawful and indecent assault and two counts of sexual penetration without consent, for which he was sentenced to a total of 4 years and 8 months imprisonment. The Full Bench found the circumstances demonstrated premeditation, a tendency to vice, lack of probity, and lack of remorse, rendering him not a fit and proper person to remain a legal practitioner. He was struck off the Roll. A separate reference concerning unprofessional conduct was stood over as unnecessary to determine.
Duties found breached:
- Personal probity and fitness to practise
- No unlawful discrimination or harassment
- No conflict between current clients
Aggravating factors:
- Premeditation
- Tendency to vice and lack of probity
- Lack of remorse or insight shown during trial
- Running a defence described as a farrago of lies, causing further harm to the victim
Duties engaged
Other decisions involving this respondent
Matched by respondent name — may include a different person with the same name.