Jack Anthony Medlicott
Allegation / charges
Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, SRA Principles 2019
Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision
Jack Anthony Medlicott, a partner at MSB Solicitors, signed two leases between 26 and 27 April 2022 falsely confirming that he had witnessed the signature of Person B, when Person B was not present, had not signed the leases, and whom the Respondent had never met. He had initially refused his client's request but agreed after being asked to do a "favour". The Tribunal, dealing with the matter on the papers by way of Agreed Outcome, found the admissions properly made and held that the only appropriate and proportionate sanction was to strike him off the Roll. The Respondent later assisted police and testified as a prosecution witness against the client, who was convicted and sentenced to 16 years imprisonment.
Duties found breached:
Aggravating factors:
- Misconduct was deliberate and involved two documents
- Although the act of signing was brief, the Respondent did not correct the position until several months later
- Experienced solicitor and a partner with almost seven/eight years' post-qualification experience
- Direct control and responsibility for the circumstances giving rise to the misconduct
- Potential for significant harm as it gave the impression the leases had been validly executed
Mitigating factors:
- Cooperated with the SRA throughout the investigation
- Self-reported / brought matters to the attention of the Firm
- Assisted the police and testified as a prosecution witness against Client A (non-agreed mitigation advanced by Respondent)
Codes & rules applied
Duties engaged
- Act only on proper, lawful instructions
- Advise on alternatives, settlement and outcome
- Avoid wasting the court's time
- Cease acting on client perjury or disobedience
- Client-care and engagement terms
- Client confidentiality
- Competence
- Complaints procedure and handling
- Comply with and respect court orders
- Comply with rules of foreign jurisdictions
- Continuity and handover of representation
- Cooperate openly with regulators
- Costs and fee transparency to client
- Diligence and timeliness
- Disclose adverse law to the court
- Disclose material information to client
- Disclose referrals, commissions and benefits
- Fair dealing with unrepresented parties
- Fair, reasonable and lawful fees
- Full disclosure on ex parte applications
- Good faith and courtesy to colleagues
- Handle inadvertently received material
- Hold a current practising certificate
- Honour professional undertakings
- Keep client informed and respond promptly
- Maintain competence and CPD
- Manage conflict arising mid-matter
- No abuse of process or coercive powers
- No acting against a former client
- No baseless or threatened misconduct report
- No conflict between current clients
- No direct dealing with represented party
- No improper benefit, loan or bequest
- No improper communication with the court
- No improper fee-sharing or partnership
- No improper questioning of witnesses
- No improper solicitation or touting
- Non-discriminatory acceptance and cab-rank
- No obstruction or victimisation of reporters
- No own-interest conflict
- No payments to witnesses on evidence
- No personal opinion or familiarity with court
- No prejudicial publicity for pending cases
- No standing bail or surety for client
- No taking unfair advantage
- No tampering with or coaching witnesses
- Not mislead the court
- Not mislead third parties or opponents
- Not misrepresent regulated status
- Pay instructed practitioners and agents
- Professional indemnity insurance
- Proper basis for allegations
- Proper termination and return of instructions
- Prosecutorial duty of disclosure
- Prosecutorial fairness and impartiality
- Protect capacity and vulnerable clients
- Protect legal professional privilege
- Report serious misconduct of others
- Safeguard documents and limit liens
- Self-report to the regulator
- Truthful, non-misleading advertising