Skip to main content
discipline 3 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

John Leonard Turner

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number11983/2019
Date01/01/2019
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Solicitors' Accounts Rules

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
CostsGBP 500
Dishonesty foundYes

John Leonard Turner, a solicitor and sole principal (COLP/COFA) of Lindsay Salt and Turner, admitted that between 16 May 2017 and 7 November 2017 he withdrew £83,834 of client money on eighteen occasions and transferred it to office account to fund his practice without client consent, causing a client account shortage. He also caused further shortages, withdrew office money before issuing bills of costs, and failed to remedy breaches promptly. The Tribunal found all allegations proved beyond reasonable doubt, including dishonesty (which he admitted under the Ivey test). Despite significant mitigation (financial pressure, full admissions, insight, remediation of the shortage via a lifetime mortgage and family loans), the Tribunal found no exceptional circumstances and ordered him struck off. Costs, though reasonable at £8,711.50, were reduced to £500 due to his impecuniosity and bankruptcy.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Dishonest conduct
  • Deliberate and calculated misconduct
  • Repeated over a protracted period of time (18 separate transfers)
  • Breach of significant position of trust as sole principal, COLP and COFA
  • Significant harm to reputation of the profession and clients

Mitigating factors:

  • Endeavoured to make good the inappropriate withdrawals from client account
  • Demonstrated genuine and significant insight into misconduct
  • Open with the Applicant and made full admissions
  • Attended the hearing to apologise, which was brave and to his credit
  • Under financial pressure at the time; motivation was not nefarious

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/11983/