Skip to main content
discipline 3 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Gordon Leslie Kingan

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number9013/2004
Date01/01/2004
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Client Money, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
CostsGBP 20,000
Dishonesty foundYes

Gordon Leslie Kingan, a sole practitioner admitted in 1973, faced 24 allegations of conduct unbefitting a solicitor including numerous Solicitors Accounts Rules breaches, failures to deliver Accountant's Reports, failures to reply to the OSS/Law Society, practising in breach of certificate conditions, and misappropriation of client funds. He admitted all allegations except dishonesty. The Tribunal found he had used £10,000 in cash provided by client Mr M (kept in his office safe rather than paid into client account) for his own purposes, and applying the Twinsectra test made an express finding of dishonesty. The Tribunal held he was unfit to practise even without the dishonesty finding, struck him off the Roll, ordered £20,000 costs, and directed the £1,500 compensation direction be enforced as a High Court order.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Previous 1989 Tribunal finding of similar accounts breaches and a fine, showing failure to learn
  • Had been alerted to accounts breaches at earlier inspection and agreed to correct them but did not
  • Wide range and number of breaches demonstrating wilful disregard of the rules
  • Used £10,000 client cash for personal purposes and paid mortgage from client account
  • Continued to practise alone in breach of practising certificate conditions

Mitigating factors:

  • Client Mr M did not complain and supported the Respondent's account regarding the £10,000
  • Sole practitioner under heavy workload pressure carrying out all administrative tasks
  • Some breaches identified and rectified before Law Society involvement; shortage rectified during inspection
  • Already effectively suspended since the intervention and suffered substantial costs of intervention
  • Cooperated with and did not dispute the investigation reports

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/9013/