Decision record
Christopher Ricketts
JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number7018/1995
Date01/01/1995
OutcomeS.43 Order (clerks)
Allegation / charges
Others
Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision
SanctionOther
CostsGBP 627
Dishonesty foundNo
Christopher Ricketts, an outdoor clerk (not a solicitor) employed by Rafiq & Co, twice failed to notify criminal clients of hearing dates, leading to wasted costs orders against his firm, and on oath told the judge he was a trainee solicitor when he was an outdoor clerk. He admitted the allegations. The Tribunal found he had misled the court, a serious matter, but made no express finding of dishonesty. It made a Section 43 order controlling his employment within the solicitors' profession and ordered him to pay fixed costs of £627.45.
Duties found breached:
Aggravating factors:
- Misleading the court on oath was a serious matter
- Gave a misleading indication of his standing and authority in the matter
Mitigating factors:
- Apologised and said he had learned a salutary lesson
- Was 'put on the spot' when asked to explain to the judge
- Was endeavouring to assist the court
- Heavy workload with inadequate support, supervision and guidance
- Did not have sole responsibility for the matter
- Around ten years' experience as an outdoor clerk; married with two children; had been promised articles