Skip to main content
discipline 4 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Catherine Ann Sandbach

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number12016/2019
Date01/01/2019
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Breaches

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
CostsGBP 2,600
Dishonesty foundYes

Catherine Ann Sandbach, an assistant solicitor at Woodfines Solicitors LLP, admitted three allegations of misconduct involving deliberately misleading clients (Ms SD and Mr TM) into believing their matters were progressing through court when no proceedings had been issued, and fabricating/backdating an email to the Insolvency Service to mislead client Mr SJ regarding an annulment application. She admitted dishonesty as an aggravating feature of each allegation. The matter was resolved by an Agreed Outcome dealt with on the papers. The Tribunal found significant dishonesty repeated over time with no exceptional circumstances and struck her off the Roll, ordering her to pay costs of £2,600.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Dishonesty was admitted and formed an aggravating feature
  • Misconduct repeated across three clients over an extended period
  • Repeated untruths told to conceal her own inaction
  • Had multiple opportunities to reflect and own up but did not do so
  • Abused the trust clients placed in her

Mitigating factors:

  • Under a great deal of stress with a significant workload and limited resources
  • Expected to deal with matters beyond her experience
  • Suffering from anxiety and depression, supported by a medical report
  • Unable to obtain medication due to work pressures
  • Accepted misconduct at the earliest opportunity
  • Genuine remorse
  • No personal gain; actions only to buy time
  • Clients did not appear to suffer financially or otherwise
  • Only 3 matters out of hundreds in an otherwise unblemished career
  • Left legal practice with no intention of returning

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/12016/