Skip to main content
discipline 3 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Simon Paget-Brown

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number12551/2024
Date13/09/2024
OutcomeSuspend - Fixed Period

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Code of Conduct 2011, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Failures, Solicitors Accounts Rules 1998, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2019, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionSuspension
Suspension12 months
CostsGBP 15,000
Dishonesty foundNo

Simon Paget-Brown, a solicitor admitted in 2000 and sole practitioner of Paget-Brown (UK), admitted four allegations arising between 2018 and 2020: participating in/facilitating transactions bearing hallmarks of advance fee fraud (linked to Wraith Capital and convicted fraudster Winston Donaldson) while also being a director of the lending company giving rise to an own interest conflict; failing to perform an undertaking within the agreed timescale; using the firm's client account as a banking facility; and failing to maintain accounting records or obtain accountant's reports. Recklessness was admitted as an aggravating feature. There was no finding or allegation of dishonesty. Clients lost significant sums (Company C lost £212,800). The Tribunal approved an agreed outcome of a 12-month suspension followed by indefinite practising restrictions and ordered costs of £15,000. Striking off was not considered justified.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Recklessness (admitted) demonstrating inappropriate risk-taking and lack of regard for consequences
  • High culpability - experienced solicitor of over 18 years with direct control/responsibility
  • Held roles of COLP and COFA and was a director of the company issuing loan monies
  • Foreseeable harm - Company C lost £212,800
  • Respondent was aware Mr Donaldson was a convicted fraudster who had been imprisoned

Mitigating factors:

  • Misconduct arose partly as a result of deception by a third party (Mr Donaldson)
  • Undertaking was eventually satisfied in full (though some 30 months late) with interest
  • Some genuine insight shown by admissions, albeit made very late (day before hearing)
  • No dishonesty found or alleged
  • Respondent made considerable personal losses (in excess of £500,000)

Codes & rules applied

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/12551/