Skip to main content
discipline 4 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Paul Edmund Levy

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number12739/2025
Date02/12/2025
OutcomeFine

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Code of Conduct 2011, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionFine
FineGBP 15,000
CostsGBP 35,387
Dishonesty foundNo

Paul Edmund Levy, a solicitor admitted in 1999, acted in two unregulated secured loan transactions (Persons A and B) between September and December 2019 while a consultant at Singhania & Co Ltd. He failed to identify and respond to multiple indicators of potential fraud and/or money laundering and caused or materially contributed to the Firm's failure to comply with the 2017 MLRs (inadequate CDD/EDD). The transactions bore hallmarks of fraud, with imposter solicitors and payments requested to non-borrower parties. Allegations 1.1 and 1.2 were found proved on his admissions; the manifest incompetence allegation (1.3) was withdrawn with leave after late new evidence on identification. No dishonesty was alleged or found. The Tribunal imposed a £15,000 fine (Fine Band Level 3) and costs of £35,386.90, with no practising restrictions.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Misconduct occurred twice in rapid succession
  • Previous appearance before the Tribunal in 2022 for Accounts Rules breaches, from which he had failed to learn
  • Persisted in apportioning some blame to others despite accepting responsibility
  • Potentially misled the regulator by providing relevant information only shortly before the substantive hearing
  • Foreseeable risk of serious harm; failings led to identity fraud complaints affecting clients and victims

Mitigating factors:

  • No allegation of dishonesty or recklessness; conduct was negligence/failure to identify warning signs
  • Himself deceived and manipulated by sophisticated criminals
  • Cooperated with the Applicant and made admissions, avoiding a contested hearing
  • Demonstrated a degree of insight into his misconduct
  • Undertook AML training and became MLRO for current firm (SRA had accepted on 7 July 2023 he was capable of holding MLRO position)
  • Devastating personal impact and stress over many years, impact on mental health

Codes & rules applied

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/12739/