Decision record
Clive Graham Wood
Allegation / charges
Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Lack of Integrity, Recklessness, SRA Principles 2019
Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision
Clive Graham Wood, an experienced sole practitioner family solicitor, was found to have taken unfair advantage of a litigant in person (Person M) by repeatedly requesting her contact details during July 2022 despite her clear refusal and lack of any legal obligation, and by instructing a private investigator to obtain her address and telephone number which he then disclosed to his client, circumventing the Family Procedure Rules. The Tribunal found allegations 1.1 and 1.2 (sub-particulars 1.2.1-1.2.3) proved, but found 1.2.4 not proved and made no finding on recklessness as it was pleaded in the alternative. No dishonesty was alleged or found. He was fined £17,500 and ordered to pay £15,000 costs (reduced from £20,312).
Duties found breached:
- Integrity
- No taking unfair advantage
- Uphold public trust in the profession
- Non-discriminatory acceptance and cab-rank
Aggravating factors:
- Respondent knew or ought reasonably to have known conduct was in material breach of obligations to protect the public and reputation of the profession
- Limited remorse or insight demonstrated in evidence
- Did not properly appreciate the position his conduct placed Person M in
- Conduct was not inadvertent or spontaneous; he had direct control and responsibility
- Experienced family law practitioner who understood the correct procedural route but consciously chose not to follow it
Mitigating factors:
- Approximately 44 years in practice without previous disciplinary findings
- Considerable stress experienced throughout investigation and hearing
- Expressed remorse in oral mitigation
- Misconduct not motivated by financial gain, personal animosity or deliberate intention to cause harm
- Cooperated throughout the investigation and proceedings
Codes & rules applied
Duties engaged
- Overriding duty to the court
- No abuse of process or coercive powers
- Integrity
- No taking unfair advantage
- Fair dealing with unrepresented parties
- No bribery or improper gifts
- Personal probity and fitness to practise
- Uphold public trust in the profession
- Keep client informed and respond promptly
- Non-discriminatory acceptance and cab-rank
- Fair, reasonable and lawful fees
- No improper benefit, loan or bequest
- Serve justice and improve the law