Decision record
Barrington E. Frankson
Allegation / charges
Struck off, Restitution ordered | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered May 01, 1999 | Court of Appeal Decision | Privy Council Decision View PDF DECISION OF THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE GENERAL LEGAL COUNCIL COMPLAINT NO. 5197 BASIL WHITTER At …
Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision
Attorney Barrington Earl Frankson, a partner in Gaynair & Fraser, was retained by Monica Whitter on a 25% contingency basis to pursue property claims against her former husband. After obtaining orders for sale of the matrimonial home 'Cromarty', he failed to enforce the judgment, then after his retainer was terminated sued the complainant for fees (without first serving a bill of costs contrary to s.22), obtained default judgment, and used the resulting sale of her half-share to collect over $8m. He paid out large sums as fees to himself and W.B. Frankson (some before the sale agreement was even signed), placed nothing in an interest-bearing account, never accounted to the client, and paid her nothing. The Tribunal, applying the criminal standard, found him guilty of professional misconduct including charging unfair fees, delay, failure to inform, inexcusable negligence and the gravest breach of failing to account. It found he acted without integrity, probity and trustworthiness in a deliberate course of conduct misapplying client funds, but did not expressly use the word 'dishonesty'. He was struck off the roll and ordered to make restitution with interest.
Duties found breached:
- No abuse of process or coercive powers
- No taking unfair advantage
- Keep client informed and respond promptly
- Non-discriminatory acceptance and cab-rank
- No conflict between current clients
- No improper use of client money
Aggravating factors:
- Deliberate course of conduct misapplying the complainant's funds
- Suing for fees without first serving a bill of costs contrary to s.22 of the Legal Profession Act
- Paying out fees to himself and W.B. Frankson from the sale proceeds before the sale agreement was even signed
- Clear conflict of interest with the firm Gaynair & Fraser having carriage of sale
- Failing to place client's funds in an interest-bearing account despite request
- Failing to produce any accounts or bank statements to the Tribunal
- Paid the complainant nothing from October 1996
Mitigating factors:
- Attorney was a fairly young man with a family for whom the profession was his livelihood
Duties engaged
Other decisions involving this respondent
Matched by respondent name — may include a different person with the same name.
Documents
Source: https://www.generallegalcouncil.org/judgement/barrington-e-frankson-complaint-no-5-of-1997/