Decision record
Sarinjit Singh Bahia
Allegation / charges
Account Rules breaches, Code of Conduct 2011, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, Lack of Integrity, Misappropriation of Client Account, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2019, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019
Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision
Sarinjit Singh Bahia, a solicitor and sole director/COLP/COFA of Consilium Legal Limited, admitted misconduct in preparing misleading estate accounts, retaining £27,698.10 of client money in his personal account causing a client account shortage, failing to account for £15,000 of trust loan interest, and misusing £13,560 of client money intended for SDLT. Dishonesty and lack of integrity allegations were withdrawn by the SRA. The Tribunal initially rejected two earlier proposed Agreed Outcomes as too lenient (given his prior disciplinary history in 2007 and 2019), but approved a final SOAF. The Tribunal found no express dishonesty (motivation unknown, careless conduct). It imposed a £15,000 fine (Level 3), a seven-year Restriction Order, and £20,000 costs.
Duties found breached:
- Proper basis for allegations
- No improper communication with the court
- No conflict between current clients
Aggravating factors:
- Previous regulatory history: appeared before the Tribunal twice before, in 2007 (severely reprimanded following assault conviction) and 2019 (fined £30,000)
- Repeated misconduct with sustained carelessness over preparation of estate accounts and accounting for client monies
- Possibility of future misconduct / propensity to misconduct
Mitigating factors:
- No loss or harm caused to clients and no income generated from the misconduct
- Client account shortages made good from the Respondent's own personal funds
- Cooperated with the SRA throughout and made open and frank admissions
- Tragic circumstances of the retainer (brother's death by suicide) causing emotional entanglement
- Undertook therapy, changed lifestyle, low risk of repetition
- Nieces/beneficiaries financially benefitted in excess of £60,000
Codes & rules applied
Duties engaged
- Proper basis for allegations
- No improper communication with the court
- Honesty
- Integrity
- No bribery or improper gifts
- Personal probity and fitness to practise
- Uphold public trust in the profession
- No unlawful discrimination or harassment
- Act in the client's best interests
- Advise objectively, not a mere conduit
- No conflict between current clients
- No improper use of client money
- Prompt accounting and return of money
- Firm governance, systems and compliance