Skip to main content
discipline 30 September 2026

The duty in context

No conflict between current clients client

The lawyer must not act for two or more current clients with conflicting interests except within defined exceptions with each client's informed consent and protection of confidentiality.

1,282 cases 61% strike-off avg suspension 17.6 mo avg fine 138,302 623 with dishonesty finding

How the codes express this duty

E&W Solicitors SRA Principles & Code CCS 6.2 strong 841 cases
6.2 You do not act in relation to a matter or particular aspect of it if you have a conflict of interest or a significant risk of such a conflict in relation to that matter or aspect of it, unless: (a) the clients have a substantially common interest ...; or the clients are competing for the same objective, and the conditions below are met ...
E&W Barristers BSB Handbook rC21.3; gC69 strong 29 cases
rC21.3 there is a conflict of interest, or real risk of conflict of interest, between the prospective client and one or more of your former or existing clients in respect of the particular matter unless all of the clients who have an interest in the particular matter give their informed consent to your acting in such circumstances;
Cayman Islands Legal Services Code 2026 R.7.1; R.7.2; R.7.3 strong
Except in the limited circumstances dealt with in R.7.3, an attorney-at-law or a recognised law entity shall not act if there is a conflict of interests or a significant risk of a conflict... may act, in non-contentious matters, for more than one client whose interests conflict in the matter only with the informed written consent of all clients.
AU Solicitors Solicitors' Conduct Rules Rules 11.1; 11.2; 11.3; 11.4 strong 126 cases
11.1 A solicitor and a law practice must avoid conflicts between the duties owed to two or more current clients. 11.2 If a solicitor or a law practice seeks to act for two or more clients in the same or related matters where the clients' interests are adverse and there is a conflict or potential conflict... the solicitor or law practice must not act, except where permitted by Rules 11.3 and 11.4.
AU Barristers Uniform Barristers Rules r113 strong 38 cases
A barrister who is briefed to appear for two or more parties in any case must determine as soon as possible whether the interests of the clients may, as a real possibility, conflict and, if so, the barrister must then return the brief for: (a) all the clients in the case of confidentiality to which Rule 108 would apply; or (b) one or more of the clients so as to remove that possibility of conflict.
IE Solicitors Law Society Guide Ch3 — General; Conflict of interest between two clients; Non-conveyancing transactions strong 50 cases
A solicitor should not act in a matter, or any part of a matter, where there is a conflict of interest... If a solicitor, acting with ordinary care, would give different advice to different clients about the same matter, there is a conflict of interest, and the solicitor should not act for both clients... Where clients consent to one firm representing both parties to a non-conveyancing transaction, the law requires that each client gives informed consent.
IE Barristers Bar Code of Conduct Rule 3.16; Rule 10.10 partial 50 cases
In cases involving several parties, Barristers on receipt of instructions for more than one of such parties should consider whether or not any conflict arises as between the individual interests of each of the clients and they shall advise the solicitor as to whether any of the clients should be separately advised and represented by a Barrister or solicitor. ... Barristers may appear for more than one defendant in a criminal trial provided they have satisfied themselves that there is no conflict of interest.
JM Attorneys Canons of Professional Ethics Canon IV(k); Canon IV(l); Canon IV(m) strong 125 cases
Subject to the provisions of Canon IV (l), an Attorney shall not accept or continue his retainer or employment on behalf of two or more clients if their interests are likely to conflict or if the independent professional judgment of the Attorney is likely to be impaired. (l) Notwithstanding the provisions of Canon IV (k), an Attorney may represent multiple clients if he can adequately represent the interests of each and if each consent to such representation after full disclosure of the possible effects of such multiple representation.
JE Lawyers Law Society of Jersey Code R.6.1; R.6.3 strong
Except in the limited circumstances dealt with in R.6.3, a member or their firm must not act if there is a conflict of interests or a significant risk of a conflict... A member or their firm may act, in non-contentious matters, for more than one client whose interests conflict in the matter only with the informed written consent of all clients.
ON Lawyers LSO Rules of Prof. Conduct r 3.4-2; r 3.4-3 strong
3.4-2 A lawyer shall not represent a client in a matter when there is a conflict of interest unless there is consent, which must be fully informed and voluntary after disclosure, from all affected clients and the lawyer reasonably believes that he or she is able to represent each client without having a material adverse effect upon the representation of or loyalty to the other client. [3.4-3 Despite rule 3.4-2, a lawyer shall not represent opposing parties in a dispute.]
BC Lawyers BC Code r 3.4-2 strong 35 cases
A lawyer must not represent a client in a matter when there is a conflict of interest unless there is express or implied consent from all clients and the lawyer reasonably believes that he or she is able to represent each client without having a material adverse effect upon the representation of or loyalty to the other client.
NZ Lawyers Conduct & Client Care Rules r 6.1 strong
A lawyer must not act for more than 1 client on a matter in any circumstances where there is a more than negligible risk that the lawyer may be unable to discharge the obligations owed to 1 or more of the clients.
SCO Solicitors LSS Standards of Conduct B1.7 strong 55 cases
You must not act for two or more clients in matters where there is a conflict of interest between the clients or for any client where there is a conflict between the interest of the client and your interest or that of your practice unit.
SG Lawyers Professional Conduct Rules 2015 r 20 (Conflict, or potential conflict, between interests of 2 or more clients) strong 8 cases
20 Conflict, or potential conflict, between interests of 2 or more clients
HK Solicitors Solicitors' Guide Principle 9.01 strong
A solicitor or firm of solicitors must not accept instructions to act for two or more clients where there is a conflict or a significant risk of conflict between the interests of those clients.
HK Barristers Bar Code of Conduct para 10.14(a) strong
If after he has accepted the brief or instructions on behalf of more than one lay client, there is or appears to be a conflict or a risk of conflict between the interests of any one or more of such clients, he must not continue to act for any client unless all such clients give their consent to his so acting and he can do so without embarrassment.

Cases dealing with this duty

Clear

1,282 decisions · link basis: found breached = a tribunal finding; rule cited = the mapped provision is cited in the decision; text match = high-precision text pattern

  • Malcolm Congreve Brown
    SDT solicitor 9646/2007 2007-01-01 text match

    Client Money, Criminal Convictions, Solicitors' Accounts Rules, Others

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Christopher Elliot Cleaver Thomas
    SDT solicitor 9755/2007 2007-01-01 found breached

    Breaches, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules, Others

    Suspend - Indefinite 1 PDF View decision
  • Lorraine Anne Miers
    SDT solicitor 9846/2007 2007-01-01 found breached

    Breaches, Client Money, Failures

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Hazel Mann
    SDT solicitor 9645/2007 2007-01-01 found breached

    Others

    S.43 Order (clerks) 1 PDF View decision
  • Vanessa Glover
    SDT solicitor 9849/2007 2007-01-01 found breached

    Client Money, Delays, Failures

    S.43 Order (clerks) 1 PDF View decision
  • Mubeen Kashmiri & Mahendra Chandmal Jain
    SDT solicitor 9657/2007 2007-01-01 found breached

    Breaches, Client Money, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules, Others

    Strike off, Suspend - Indefinite 1 PDF View decision
  • P G Stonelake & 2 Others
    SDT solicitor 9824/2007 2007-01-01 found breached

    Breaches, Client Money, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules, Others

    Reprimand, Strike off, Suspend - Fixed Period 1 PDF View decision
  • Ayoola Adebambo Olaitan
    SDT solicitor 9725/2007 2007-01-01 found breached

    Breaches, Client Money, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules, Others

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Ian Muir Jewell
    SDT solicitor 9779/2007 2007-01-01 found breached

    Breaches, Others

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • J R Beresford & D H Smith
    SDT solicitor 9666/2007 2007-01-01 found breached

    Breaches, Failures, Others

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Antony Paul Raiwa
    SDT solicitor 9840/2007 2007-01-01 found breached

    Breaches, Failures, Others

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Christopher John Thorley
    SDT solicitor 9687/2007 2007-01-01 found breached

    Breaches, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules

    Suspend - Indefinite 1 PDF View decision
  • Paul Nicholas Smith
    SDT solicitor 9652/2007 2007-01-01 found breached

    Breaches, Client Money, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules

    Suspend - Indefinite 1 PDF View decision
  • Christopher Andrew Dudzinski
    SDT solicitor 9812/2007 2007-01-01 found breached

    Breaches, Client Money, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules, Others

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Mark I Bronzite & Another
    SDT solicitor 9848/2007 2007-01-01 found breached text match

    Breaches, Client Money, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules, Others

    Strike off, Suspend - Fixed Period 1 PDF View decision
  • 9856-2007 - T A Izzet & Another
    SDT solicitor 9856/2007 2007-01-01 found breached

    Breaches, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules

    Strike off, Suspend - Fixed Period 1 PDF View decision
  • Rimindeep Bedi
    SDT solicitor 9855/2007 2007-01-01 found breached

    Others

    S.43 Order (clerks) 1 PDF View decision
  • Shannon Michelle Barber
    LSBC lawyer 2006-11-09 found breached

    Agreed Statement of Facts

    Agreed Statement of Facts View decision
  • Michael Lee PODMORE
    LSC-QLD solicitor Michael Podmore & Associates 2006-10-25 found breached

    Guilty of professional misconduct on 10 charges

    other 2 PDFs View decision
  • David Santiago Morales
    GLC attorney 92 of 2005 2006-09-16 found breached

    Fined | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered September 16, 2006. View PDF RULING of THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE GENERAL LEGAL COUNCILCOMPLAINT No. 92/2005 BETWEEN HEADLEY WELLINGTON COMPLAINANT AND DAVID MORA…

    Fined 1 PDF View decision
  • Arlene Ann Gaynor
    GLC attorney 72 of 2004 2006-07-28 found breached

    Appeal Dismissed | Court of Appeal decision delivered July 28, 2006. View PDF JAMAICA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL SUPREME COURT CIVIL APPEAL NO. 72 OF 2004 BEFORE: THE HON. MR. JUSTICE PANTON, J.A.THE HON. MR. JUSTICE SMITH,…

    Appeal Dismissed 1 PDF View decision
  • J. Vernon (Jonathan) Ricketts
    GLC attorney 128 of 2005 2006-07-22 found breached

    Struck off, Restitution Ordered | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered July 22, 2006. View PDF DECISION OF THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE GENERAL LEGAL COUNCILCOMPLAINT NO. 128/2005 In the Matter of FREDERICK MO…

    Struck off, Restitution Ordered 1 PDF View decision
  • JANET WALTON
    LPBWA lawyer PO Box 45 OSBORNE PARK WA 6917 Legal Practitioners Complaints Committee v Walton [2006] WASAT 155 2006-06-06 found breached

    Unprofessional Conduct and Unsatisfactory Conduct by way of Unprofessional Conduct and Suspended

    Unprofessional Conduct and Unsatisfactory Conduct by way of Unprofessional Conduct and Suspended 1 PDF View decision
  • Lorraine Earle
    GLC attorney 87 of 2003 2006-05-13 found breached

    Fined, Already Struck off | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered May 13, 2006. View PDF DECISION OF THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THEGENERAL LEGAL COUNCILCOMPLAINT NO. 87/2003 In the Matter of LUNETH ORAM, RASFORD …

    Fined, Already Struck off 1 PDF View decision
  • Michael A. Williams
    GLC attorney 194 of 2000 2006-04-07 found breached

    Suspended, Restitution Ordered | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered April 07, 2006. View PDF DECISION OF THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE GENERAL LEGAL COUNCILCOMPLAINT N0.167/04 BETWEEN DAISYNELL VERNON THE COM…

    Suspended, Restitution Ordered 1 PDF View decision

Duty classification does not yet cover every jurisdiction (Ontario, New Zealand and Singapore decisions are indexed but not yet duty-classified), so counts here understate those corpora.