Skip to main content
discipline 3 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

(unnamed respondent)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number12430/2023
Date14/06/2023
OutcomeS.44E/ S.46/Paragraph 14C Appeals

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionOther
CostsGBP 37,870
Dishonesty foundNo

Mr Andrew, former HOLP/HOFA of Ontier LLP, appealed the SRA Adjudication Panel's decision upholding a rebuke for causing/allowing client account shortages. The SRA conceded on appeal that the largest shortage (£93,600) had been found in error. In respect of the remaining shortages (£13,969 and £10,000), the Tribunal found the Adjudication Panel had given inadequate reasons—failing to explain why Mr Andrew could not rely on professional bookkeepers (Kingston Smith) or why he was personally culpable rather than vicariously liable. This amounted to a serious procedural irregularity, so the decision was overturned and the appeal allowed. The SRA was ordered to pay Mr Andrew's costs of £37,869.77 (reduced from the £61,767.72 claimed, including a one-third reduction to leading counsel's fee).

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/12430/