Skip to main content
discipline 3 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Philip Crowe

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number11335/2015
Date01/01/2015
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Client Money, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
CostsGBP 30,000
Dishonesty foundYes

Philip Crowe, a sole practitioner solicitor admitted in 1977, was found to have committed serious breaches of the Solicitors Accounts Rules and Code of Conduct arising from his administration of the estate and memorial trust of the late Mr HHL, of which he was executor and co-trustee. An SRA forensic investigation revealed a cash shortage of £154,146.18, caused by non-delivery of 16 bills totalling £71,646.18, overcharging of about £50,000 (effective rate up to £750/hour), improper payments of £82,500 (two £35,000 cheques to co-trustee Mr GG and £12,500 to himself), and a £121,950 transfer of Trust capital used to pay off his own business loan, releasing a bank charge on his wife's property. The Tribunal found dishonesty proved on allegations 1.4, 1.5 and 1.6 (but not 1.3) under the Twinsectra test, rejecting his claim to be acting on the deceased's unevidenced wishes to go behind the Will. With no exceptional circumstances, he was struck off the Roll and ordered to pay £30,000 costs, not to be enforced without the Tribunal's leave given his poor financial position.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Dishonesty proved on three allegations
  • Conduct occurred over several years
  • Use of position as trustee/executor to benefit himself and Mr GG
  • Misdescription of ledger entries to conceal the true nature of payments
  • Depletion of Trust capital in breach of the Will
  • Previous disciplinary finding (1998) for accounts rule breaches including using client money for his own benefit
  • Failure to safeguard Trust money

Mitigating factors:

  • Attended the hearing and engaged with the process with good grace
  • Expressed shame and acknowledged he had continued in practice too long
  • Cooperative and courteous during investigation
  • Poor financial circumstances (relevant only to enforcement of costs)

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/11335/