Skip to main content
discipline 4 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Charles Clutton

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number8453/2001
Date01/01/2001
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Criminal Convictions

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
CostsGBP 577
Dishonesty foundYes

The Respondent, a solicitor, was convicted at Knutsford Crown Court of six offences under the Environmental Protection Act and fined £9,000 for signing false returns to the local authority understating the number of cattle carcasses incinerated by his family company. The Tribunal found the allegation of conduct unbefitting a solicitor substantiated and, relying on the sentencing Recorder's finding, treated the conduct as dishonest. Despite significant mitigation and concern about proportionality given his brother's greater role, the Tribunal held that a solicitor who knowingly signed false returns could not remain a solicitor and struck him off the Roll, ordering costs of £577.33, with filing suspended for seven days.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Knowingly signed false returns on three separate occasions
  • Concealment to enable extra profit as found by the sentencing Recorder
  • Dishonesty affecting the reputation of the solicitors' profession

Mitigating factors:

  • Acts took place on only three days
  • Business run almost exclusively by his brother; peripheral involvement
  • Difficult to refuse a family member
  • No previous disciplinary history and unblemished professional record
  • No claim against indemnity insurance
  • No damage to environment or pollution
  • Accurate returns made to Intervention Board; company paid only for work done
  • Already paid heavy price through fine and costs in criminal proceedings
  • Not a danger to the public

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/8453/