Skip to main content
discipline 4 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Robert William Henry Arnison

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number12437/2023
Date27/06/2023
OutcomeSuspend - Fixed Period

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Failures

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionSuspension
Suspension12 months
CostsGBP 17,250
Dishonesty foundYes

Robert Arnison, a partner at DLA Piper, admitted that on 5 February 2020 he inserted a false witness signature (a squiggle) on a legal charge document during a £13.5m property transaction and forwarded it to the lending bank's solicitors, purporting it had been properly witnessed. He admitted dishonesty and breaches of Principles 2, 4 and 5. The Tribunal, approving an agreed outcome, found exceptional circumstances existed (momentary, unplanned, no personal benefit, impaired decision-making, prompt self-reporting) placing the case in the 'small residual category' where strike-off was disproportionate. It imposed a 12-month suspension effective immediately (refusing to backdate) and costs of £17,250.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Very experienced solicitor and partner at the time of misconduct
  • Misconduct took place in the context of a high value (£13.5m) property transaction
  • Involved a false representation being made to another party
  • Risk of harm to the public

Mitigating factors:

  • Misconduct was momentary, unplanned and a 'moment of madness'
  • No personal benefit
  • Medical evidence indicated impaired decision making at the time
  • Self-reported to the firm almost immediately and to the SRA
  • Full admissions and cooperation with the SRA
  • 23 years of practice with no prior regulatory or disciplinary history
  • Complete insight and genuine remorse
  • Overloaded with work, on verge of burnout
  • No actual harm caused
  • File review of ~40 cases found no other malpractice

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/12437/