Skip to main content
discipline 3 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Charles Edward Shaw Rothwell

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number9686/2007
Date01/01/2007
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Client Money, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
CostsGBP 12,000
Dishonesty foundYes

Charles Edward Shaw Rothwell, a solicitor and equity partner at Keeble Hawson, admitted six allegations of breaches of the Solicitors Accounts Rules 1998, including transferring client funds between unconnected matters and utilising clients' funds for the benefit of others. He denied dishonesty. The Tribunal, applying the combined Twinsectra test to the criminal standard, found dishonesty in three client matters (O, WM & Co and S & Co), rejecting his explanation that he was merely manipulating the firm's own money, noting his conduct deceived his partners and the records did not reflect the true position. Dishonesty was not found in the B and D matters (accepted as errors). Despite mitigation (no client loss, financial reparation, work pressures and inexperience), the Tribunal struck him off the Roll and ordered costs of £12,000.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Dishonest conduct found in three client matters (O, WM & Co and S & Co)
  • Actions deceived his partners as to the true state of affairs; bookkeeping records did not reflect true position
  • Failed to remedy misapplied client funds on discovery
  • Derived a benefit in that pressure to collect costs was temporarily lifted

Mitigating factors:

  • No client suffered financial loss and former partners were not disadvantaged
  • Respondent made good shortfalls, passing a six figure sum to former partners
  • Young and relatively inexperienced solicitor under considerable pressure of work and responsibility
  • Lack of support from senior members of the firm
  • Personal/domestic difficulties including marital problems
  • Positive testimonials as to competence and integrity
  • Admitted all allegations save dishonesty from early in proceedings

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/9686/