Skip to main content
discipline 1 October 2026

The duty in context

Professional independence integrity

The lawyer must maintain their professional independence and not allow it to be compromised by the client, the court, an employer, or any third party.

219 cases 68% strike-off avg suspension 6.0 mo avg fine 8,750 8 with dishonesty finding

How the codes express this duty

E&W Solicitors SRA Principles & Code Principle 3 strong 151 cases
You act: 1.3 with independence.
E&W Barristers BSB Handbook CD4; rC3.5; rC8 strong 44 cases
CD4 You must maintain your independence. rC3.5 you must ensure that your ability to act independently is not compromised. rC8 You must not do anything which could reasonably be seen by the public to undermine your honesty, integrity (CD3) and independence (CD4).
Cayman Islands Legal Services Code 2026 P.5; R.2.1(e); R.3.1 strong
Attorneys-at-law shall not allow their professional independence to be compromised... ensure that the attorney-at-law's ability to act independently is not compromised.
AU Solicitors Solicitors' Conduct Rules Rules 4.1.4; 17.1 strong 18 cases
4.1.4 avoid any compromise to their integrity and professional independence. 17.1 A solicitor representing a client in a matter that is before the court must not act as the mere mouthpiece of the client... and must exercise the forensic judgments called for during the case independently...
AU Barristers Uniform Barristers Rules rr25,41,4(b) strong 2 cases
A barrister must not act as the mere mouthpiece of the client or of the instructing solicitor and must exercise the forensic judgments called for during the case independently ... A barrister has an overriding duty to the Court to act with independence in the interests of the administration of justice.
IE Solicitors Law Society Guide Ch1 — Core values: Independence strong
Solicitors must retain professional independence and the ability to advise their clients fearlessly and objectively. Independence is essential to the functioning of solicitors' relationships with all parties, and it is the duty of the solicitor to ensure that their independence is not compromised.
IE Barristers Bar Code of Conduct Rule 2.8; Rule 2.1 strong
The many duties to which Barristers are subject require their absolute independence, free from all other influence, especially such as may arise from their personal interests or external pressure. Barristers must therefore avoid any impairment of their independence and be careful not to compromise their professional standards in order to please their client, the Court or third parties.
JM Attorneys Canons of Professional Ethics Canon IV(c) strong
An Attorney shall exercise independent judgment within the bounds of the law and the ethics of the profession for the benefit of his client.
JE Lawyers Law Society of Jersey Code P.5; R.4.1; R.5.1 d) strong
Members must not allow their professional independence to be compromised... Members must not do anything which could reasonably be seen by the public to undermine their honesty, integrity and independence... [R.5.1 d)] not permit their professional client, firm or any other person to limit their discretion as to how the interests of the client can best be served.
ON Lawyers LSO Rules of Prof. Conduct r 7.3-2; r 7.3-1 strong
7.3-2 A lawyer shall not allow involvement in an outside interest to impair the exercise of the lawyer's independent judgment on behalf of a client. [7.3-1: A lawyer who engages in another profession, business, or occupation concurrently with the practice of law shall not allow such outside interest to jeopardize the lawyer's professional integrity, independence, or competence.]
BC Lawyers BC Code r 7.3-1 partial
A lawyer who engages in another profession, business or occupation concurrently with the practice of law must not allow such outside interest to jeopardize the lawyer's professional integrity, independence or competence.
NZ Lawyers Conduct & Client Care Rules r 5 strong
A lawyer must be independent and free from compromising influences or loyalties when providing services to his or her clients.
SCO Solicitors LSS Standards of Conduct B1.3 strong 1 case
You must give independent advice free from external influences or personal interests which are inconsistent with these standards.
SG Lawyers Professional Conduct Rules 2015 r 4(b) partial 3 cases
A legal practitioner’s duty to the legal practitioner’s client is subject only to the legal practitioner’s duty to the court, and must at all times be fulfilled in a manner that upholds the standing and integrity of the Singapore legal system and the legal profession in Singapore.
HK Solicitors Solicitors' Guide Principle 3.01 strong
It is fundamental to the relationship which exists between a solicitor and his client that a solicitor is able to give impartial and frank advice to his client, free from any external or adverse pressures or interests which would destroy or weaken his professional independence or the fiduciary relationship with his client.
HK Barristers Bar Code of Conduct para 10.3 strong
A practising barrister must not:- (a) compromise his professional standards in order to please his professional or lay client, the Court or a third party; or (b) permit his absolute independence, integrity and freedom from his personal interests or external pressures to be compromised ...

Cases dealing with this duty

Clear

219 decisions · link basis: found breached = a tribunal finding; rule cited = the mapped provision is cited in the decision; text match = high-precision text pattern

  • Simon James Price
    SDT solicitor 12558/2024 2024-12-20 rule cited
    Application Withdrawn, Costs only 1 PDF View decision
  • Georgie Dibbo
    BTAS barrister Middle Temple 2024-12-17 rule cited
    suspension open to appeal 1 PDF View decision
  • Kearney Robert
    BTAS barrister Inner Temple 2024-12-16 rule cited
    strike_off appeal dismissed 1 PDF View decision
  • Graeme Henry Taylor; Russell Harvey Shapiro
    SDT solicitor 12589/2024 2024-12-13 rule cited

    Code of Conduct 2007, Code of Conduct 2011, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, Lack of Integrity, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Chen Kok Siang Joseph
    SG-DT lawyer Joseph Chen & Co 2024-11-25 found breached
    Struck off the roll with immediate effect 1 PDF View decision
  • Claire Thomas
    BTAS barrister Gray's Inn 2024-11-11 rule cited
    strike_off open to appeal 2 PDFs View decision
  • Yasser Mahmood
    BTAS barrister Inner Temple Inn 2024-10-01 rule cited
    strike_off open to appeal 2 PDFs View decision
  • Simon Paget-Brown
    SDT solicitor 12551/2024 2024-09-13 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct 2011, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Failures, Solicitors Accounts Rules 1998, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2019, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

    Suspend - Fixed Period 1 PDF View decision
  • Lee, Pei Sze
    OLSC solicitor Pei Sze Lee t/as NSW Solicitor [2024] NSWCATOD 108 2024-07-25 found breached

    Failed to cooperate with, and thereby obstructed, the manager appointed to the Law Practice under s 334 of the Legal Profession Uniform Law (Ground 1) Participated in the affairs of the Law Practice after service on her…

    Costs Fine Lawyer to undertake and complete further ethics education Reprimand The Lawyer may not apply for a practising certificate that would authorise her to be a principal of a law practice until after she has held five (5) practising certificates in five (5) separate practising certificate years that authorise her to engage in supervised legal practice only $10,000.00 Proceedings Instituted 1 PDF View decision
  • Stephen Taylor
    BTAS barrister Inner Temple 2024-04-10 rule cited
    suspension appealed 1 PDF View decision
  • Farrukh Najeeb Husain
    SDT solicitor 12463/2023 2024-04-04 rule cited

    Breaches, Lack of Integrity, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Zaheer Ahmad
    BTAS barrister Lincoln's Inn 2024-04-04 rule cited
    suspension appeal dismissed 2 PDFs View decision
  • Lewis Tresman
    BTAS barrister Gray's Inn 2024-02-19 rule cited
    strike_off open to appeal 2 PDFs View decision
  • Sideris, George
    OLSC solicitor 2024-02-19 found breached

    (1) The Lawyer is unable to fulfil the inherent requirements of an Australian legal practitioner as he does not have the ability to comply with the law in relation to his entitlement to engage in legal practice, contrar…

    Cancellation of Practising Certificate Cancellation of the Lawyer’s suspended practising certificate for the year ending 30 June 2024 (under s 82(1)(d) of the Uniform Law) and restriction imposed on the Lawyer on making further applications for a practising certificate for a period of 5 years (pursuant to s 94 of the Uniform Law). $0.00 About ​ About the OLSC The Commissioner History Mission statement Structure Contact ​ Contact the OLSC Give us your feedback: online surveys Access to information (GIPAA) Community information ​ Information for lawyers Fact sheets FAQs Other regulatory and complaint-handling organisations Contact LawAccess NSW for legal information " You and Your Lawyer", Hot ​​Topics 78 Legal Information Access Centre (LIAC), State Library of NSW​ , provides access to information about the law in NSW regarding your lawyer Privacy Copyright and Disclaimer Website accessibility View decision
  • Naseem Bajwa
    BTAS barrister Gray's Inn 2024-01-09 rule cited
    strike_off Final 2 PDFs View decision
  • Sideris, George
    OLSC solicitor George Sideris & Associates Lawyers [2024] NSWCATOD 3 2024-01-05 rule cited

    In the course of legal practice the solicitor: sent correspondence directly to the client of another solicitor, in breach of rule 33 of the Legal Profession Uniform Law Australian Solicitors’ Conduct Rules 2015 (NSW) (C…

    Costs Order recommending removal of lawyer's name from the Roll of Australian Lawyers 2 PDFs View decision
  • Karen Nicholson
    SDT solicitor 12290/2021 2023-11-03 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct 2011, Dishonesty, Lack of Integrity, SRA Principles 2011

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Carly Walters
    BTAS barrister Lincoln's Inn 2023-09-28 rule cited
    strike_off Final 1 PDF View decision
  • Keith Flavell
    SDT solicitor 12349/2022 2023-09-06 rule cited

    Breaches, Failures

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Bing Han
    LSC-QLD solicitor Fenson & Co. Lawyers 2023-08-22 rule cited

    Guilty of professional misconduct on 1 charge

    Suspended 1 PDF View decision
  • Christopher Michael Haddock
    SDT solicitor 12401/2022 2023-08-01 rule cited

    Breaches, Client Money, Solicitors' Accounts Rules

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Glenn Charles Hurstfield
    SDT solicitor 12452/2023 2023-07-05 rule cited

    Breaches, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Andrew Stevenson & Janet Stevenson
    SDT solicitor 12431/2023 2023-06-21 rule cited

    Breaches, Solicitors' Accounts Rules

    Suspend - Fixed Period 1 PDF View decision
  • Yoo, Nicole
    OLSC solicitor Alford, Lee & Associates Pty Ltd 2023-06-01 rule cited

    Solicitor released a deposit without authority or direction of the client in contravention of s138 of the Legal Profession Uniform Law (LPUL) Breaches of rules 4 and 5 of the Legal Profession Uniform Law Australian Soli…

    Reprimand Solicitor to undertake and complete further legal education $0.00 About ​ About the OLSC The Commissioner History Mission statement Structure Contact ​ Contact the OLSC Give us your feedback: online surveys Access to information (GIPAA) Community information ​ Information for lawyers Fact sheets FAQs Other regulatory and complaint-handling organisations Contact LawAccess NSW for legal information " You and Your Lawyer", Hot ​​Topics 78 Legal Information Access Centre (LIAC), State Library of NSW​ , provides access to information about the law in NSW regarding your lawyer Privacy Copyright and Disclaimer Website accessibility View decision
  • (unnamed)
    SDT solicitor 12417/2022 2023-04-26 text match
    Restoration to the Roll - Granted 1 PDF View decision

Duty classification does not yet cover every jurisdiction (Ontario, New Zealand and Singapore decisions are indexed but not yet duty-classified), so counts here understate those corpora.