Skip to main content
discipline 1 October 2026

The duty in context

Non-discriminatory acceptance and cab-rank client

The lawyer must not unfairly refuse or withhold services on objectionable grounds and, where a cab-rank principle applies, must accept proper instructions in their field irrespective of the client, case or funding.

446 cases 75% strike-off avg suspension 18.5 mo avg fine 30,488 280 with dishonesty finding

How the codes express this duty

E&W Solicitors SRA Principles & Code CCS 1.1 partial 418 cases
1.1 You do not unfairly discriminate by allowing your personal views to affect your professional relationships and the way in which you provide your services.
E&W Barristers BSB Handbook rC28; rC29 strong 5 cases
rC28 You must not withhold your services or permit your services to be withheld: .1 on the ground that the nature of the case is objectionable to you or to any section of the public; rC29 ... you must, subject to Rule rC30 below, accept the instructions addressed specifically to you, irrespective of: .a the identity of the client; .b the nature of the case ...; .c whether the client is paying privately or is publicly funded; and .d any belief or opinion which you may have formed ...
Cayman Islands Legal Services Code 2026 R.4.1(a); R.4.1(b) partial
is free to decide whether to accept instructions from a client other than where an attorney-at-law is appointed to act under legal aid... shall not do anything to compromise or impair a person's freedom of choice in placing instructions for legal services
AU Solicitors Solicitors' Conduct Rules Rule 42.1 partial 13 cases
A solicitor must not in the course of, or in connection with, legal practice or their profession, engage in conduct which constitutes: 42.1.1 discrimination, 42.1.2 sexual harassment, or 42.1.3 any other form of harassment, or 42.1.4 workplace bullying.
AU Barristers Uniform Barristers Rules rr21,5(f) strong 2 cases
A barrister must accept a brief from a solicitor to appear before a court in a field in which the barrister practises or professes to practise if: (a) the brief is within the barrister's capacity, skill and experience; (b) the barrister would be available ... (c) the fee offered on the brief is acceptable ... and (d) the barrister is not obliged or permitted to refuse the brief under Rules 95, 97, 98 or 99.
IE Solicitors Law Society Guide Ch2 — Acceptance of instructions: General; Legally aided clients in criminal matters partial 1 case
In general, a solicitor is not bound to accept instructions from any client... However, a solicitor should not discriminate unfairly between members of the public, nor refuse to act for a person on the grounds of discrimination... Where a solicitor on the legal aid panel is either instructed by the defendant or nominated by the court to act on behalf of the defendant, they are under a duty to comply with those instructions unless they have reasonable grounds for refusing to act.
IE Barristers Bar Code of Conduct Rule 3.10; Rule 2.4 strong 1 case
Having regard to the anticipated length and complexity of a case and having regard to their other professional commitments and the provisions of this Code Barristers are bound to accept instructions in any case in the field in which they profess to practise (having regard to their experience and seniority) subject to the Payment of a proper professional fee.
JM Attorneys Canons of Professional Ethics Canon III(a); Canon III(c) strong 3 cases
An Attorney is under no obligation to act on behalf of every person who may wish to become his client, but in furtherance of the ethics of the profession to make legal services fully available, he shall not lightly decline a proffered retainer. ... (c) An Attorney shall not be deterred from accepting proffered employment owing to the fear or dislike of incurring disapproval of officials, fellow Attorneys or members of the public.
JE Lawyers Law Society of Jersey Code R.1.1 a)-b); R.1.4 partial
A member: a) is free to decide whether to accept instructions from a client other than where a member is appointed to act under the Legal Aid Scheme; b) must not do anything to compromise or impair a person's freedom of choice in placing instructions for legal services.
ON Lawyers LSO Rules of Prof. Conduct r 4.1-1 commentary [4] partial
Right to Decline Representation - A lawyer may decline a particular representation (except when assigned as counsel by a tribunal), but that discretion should be exercised prudently ... Generally, a lawyer should not decline representation merely because a person seeking legal services or that person's cause is unpopular or notorious, or because powerful interests or allegations of misconduct or malfeasance are involved, or because of the lawyer's private opinion about the guilt of the accused. [No cab-rank rule; this is a non-discriminatory-decline principle only.]
BC Lawyers BC Code r 2.1-1(c) partial 3 cases
A lawyer should accept without hesitation, and if need be without fee or reward, the cause of any person assigned to the lawyer by the court, and exert every effort on behalf of that person.
NZ Lawyers Conduct & Client Care Rules r 4 / r 4.1.1 strong
A lawyer as a professional person must be available to the public and must not, without good cause, refuse to accept instructions from any client or prospective client for services within the reserved areas of work that are within the lawyer's fields of practice. ... The following are not good cause to refuse to accept instructions: (a) any grounds of discrimination prohibited by law ...; (c) the merits of the matter ...
SCO Solicitors LSS Standards of Conduct B1.15 partial 1 case
You must not discriminate on the grounds of age, disability, gender reassignment, marriage and civil partnership, pregnancy and maternity, race, religion or belief, sex or sexual orientation in your professional dealings with other lawyers, clients, employees or others
SG Lawyers Professional Conduct Rules 2015 r 4(e) partial 2 cases
A legal practitioner must facilitate the access of members of the public to justice.
HK Solicitors Solicitors' Guide Principle 5.01 / Commentary 1 & 2 partial
A solicitor is generally free to decide whether to accept instructions from any prospective client. ... A solicitor should not refuse to accept instructions based upon the race, colour, ethnic or national origins, sex or religious or political beliefs ... In deciding whether to represent a prospective client who is accused of a crime, a solicitor should not be influenced by his own opinion of the client's guilt.
HK Barristers Bar Code of Conduct para 6.1 strong
A practising barrister must accept any brief to appear before a court or instruction to provide any other legal services in a field in which the barrister practises or professes to practise if ... and must do so irrespective of:- (i) the nature of the case; (ii) the party on whose behalf he is instructed; and (iii) any belief or opinion which he may have formed as to the character, reputation, cause, conduct, guilt or innocence of that person.

Cases dealing with this duty

Clear

446 decisions · link basis: found breached = a tribunal finding; rule cited = the mapped provision is cited in the decision; text match = high-precision text pattern

  • Maxmillian Alexander Knowles Campbell
    SDT solicitor 12674/2024 2025-11-03 found breached

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Firms 2019, Dishonesty, Lack of Integrity, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Charles Ogbonna Azotam
    SDT solicitor 12777/2025 2025-10-24 found breached

    Client Money, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Solicitors' Accounts Rules, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Paul Andrew Smith
    SDT solicitor 12732/2025 2025-10-09 found breached

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, Lack of Integrity, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Christopher James Fry
    SDT solicitor 12714/2024 2025-08-29 found breached

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, Recklessness, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Alison Haley Griffiths
    SDT solicitor 12759/2025 2025-08-29 found breached

    Breaches, Client Money, Code of Conduct 2011, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Criminal Convictions, Dishonesty, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Simon Plant; Ajaz Ali
    SDT solicitor 12715/2024 2025-08-22 found breached

    Breaches, Code of Conduct 2011, Recklessness, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

    Fine 1 PDF View decision
  • (unnamed)
    SDT solicitor 12735/2025 2025-08-22 found breached
    S.44E/ S.46/Paragraph 14C Appeals 1 PDF View decision
  • Christopher James Hawkes
    SDT solicitor 12571/2024 2025-08-22 found breached

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Jonathan Peter Durkin
    SDT solicitor 12734/2025 2025-08-22 found breached

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Recklessness, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

    Suspend - Fixed Period 1 PDF View decision
  • Laura Elizabeth Simpson
    SDT solicitor 12711/2024 2025-08-22 found breached

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Mohammed Sarfraz
    SDT solicitor 12682/2024 2025-08-22 found breached

    Breaches, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

    Suspended period of Suspension 1 PDF View decision
  • Natasha Janet Dionne Fairs
    SDT solicitor 12741/2025 2025-08-22 found breached

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • David Roger Edwards
    LSC-QLD solicitor Riverlegal 2025-08-08 found breached

    The Respondent’s conduct subject of charges 1 and 4 is characterised as professional misconduct.

    Struck off 1 PDF View decision
  • Alison Clare Banerjee
    SDT solicitor 12722/2025 2025-08-01 found breached

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Harry Francis Cottam
    SDT solicitor 12336/2022 2025-07-31 found breached

    Dishonesty, Lack of Integrity, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2011, SRA Principles 2011

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Oliver James Saxon
    SDT solicitor 12694/2024 2025-07-25 found breached

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Firms 2019, Failures, SRA Principles 2019

    Suspend - Fixed Period 1 PDF View decision
  • Matthew Stephen Becker
    SDT solicitor 12692/2024 2025-07-25 found breached

    Breaches, Client Money, Code of Conduct 2011, Dishonesty, Lack of Integrity, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2011, SRA Principles 2011

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • (unnamed)
    SDT solicitor 12723/2025 2025-07-25 found breached
    Restoration to the Roll - Refused 1 PDF View decision
  • Scott Halborg
    SDT solicitor 12667/2024 2025-07-25 found breached

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Lack of Integrity, SRA Principles 2019

    Suspend - Fixed Period 1 PDF View decision
  • Alejandro Emilio Verdu Haro
    SDT solicitor 12705/2024 2025-07-25 found breached

    Breaches, Code of Conduct 2011, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Stuart Cottis
    SDT solicitor 12706/2024 2025-07-25 found breached

    Breaches, Criminal Convictions, Lack of Integrity, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Huggins Lewis Foskett
    SDT solicitor 12702/2024 2025-07-14 found breached

    Breaches, Code of Conduct 2011, Code of Conduct for Firms 2019, Money Laundering Regulations, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

    Fine 1 PDF View decision
  • Imran Haider Khawaja
    SDT solicitor 12681/2024 2025-06-19 found breached

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Failures, SRA Principles 2019

    Fine 1 PDF View decision
  • Fasar Mahmood
    SDT solicitor 12687/2024 2025-06-19 found breached

    Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, Lack of Integrity, Misappropriation of Client Account, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2019, SRA Principles 2011

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Feisal Mohammed Raza Sheikh; Maxim Solicitors Limited
    SDT solicitor 12669/2024 2025-06-19 found breached

    Breaches, Code of Conduct 2011, Code of Conduct for Firms 2019, Failures, Money Laundering Regulations, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

    Fine 1 PDF View decision

Duty classification does not yet cover every jurisdiction (Ontario, New Zealand and Singapore decisions are indexed but not yet duty-classified), so counts here understate those corpora.