Skip to main content
discipline 4 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

James Alexander Howard

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number12398/2022
Date17/05/2023
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Breaches

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
CostsGBP 19,700
Dishonesty foundYes

James Alexander Howard, a solicitor at Penningtons Manches Cooper LLP, made a false complaint to the Co-operative Bank that it had failed to transfer £189,000 he claimed to have instructed, when in fact his accounts held only minimal balances and no such instruction was ever given. He did so to avoid telling his partner Ms Archer he lacked funds to complete a joint property purchase. To maintain the deception he fabricated bank letters, a statement of account, and numerous false emails purporting to be from the Bank, the FCA and the Financial Ombudsman, and involved a journalist. The Tribunal found all seven allegations proved on the balance of probabilities, together with breaches of Principles 2 and 6 and express findings of dishonesty. Mr Howard did not give evidence and the Tribunal drew adverse inferences. It rejected his claims that his brother had falsified documents. Finding no exceptional circumstances, the Tribunal struck him off the Roll and ordered £19,700 in costs.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Dishonesty
  • Deliberate, calculated and repeated misconduct over an extended period
  • Concealment of initial wrongdoing by compounding with further wrongdoing
  • Blaming others (his partner Ms Archer and his brother)
  • Lack of insight
  • Harm caused to Ms Archer financially and emotionally
  • Involvement of multiple organisations (Bank, FCA, Financial Ombudsman, journalist)

Mitigating factors:

  • No previous disciplinary matters
  • Previously exemplary employment record
  • No financial benefit to himself

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/12398/