Skip to main content
discipline 3 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Bryan Roger Lizzimore

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number6779/1994
Date01/01/1994
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Client Money, Delays, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
CostsGBP 4,419
Dishonesty foundYes

Bryan Roger Lizzimore, a sole practitioner admitted in 1975, faced 12 allegations arising from numerous complaints about breached undertakings, unpaid Counsel's fees, delays in client matters, failure to respond to the Bureau, and failure to supervise his assistant solicitor Mr Braithwaite. A Law Society investigation found books not compliant with the Accounts Rules, numerous false entries made at his instigation, and a minimum client account shortage of £294,676.47, with clients' money used for others not entitled. The respondent admitted all facts but denied dishonesty. The Tribunal found all allegations substantiated and expressly found the respondent had acted dishonestly, adopting a wide interpretation of dishonesty. He was struck off the Roll and ordered to pay costs of £4,418.86.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Minimum cash shortage of £294,676.47 on client account
  • Numerous false accounting entries made at respondent's instigation
  • Substantial claims on Compensation Fund (£43,698.45 paid, £446,542.31 pending)
  • Utilisation of clients' money for benefit of others not entitled
  • Extraordinary incompetence in taking on firm without a full audit despite prior Law Society intervention
  • Persistent failures to respond to numerous complaints and enquiries

Mitigating factors:

  • Thirteen years of prior sound and honest practice
  • No lavish lifestyle or evidence of personal enrichment/addiction
  • Made wholesale admissions of facts save dishonesty
  • Problems largely inherited from Mr Braithwaite's former practice
  • Attempted to ensure no one would lose in the long term

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/6779/