Skip to main content
discipline 4 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Jack Alexander Williams

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number12742/2025
Date24/12/2025
OutcomeSuspend - Fixed Period

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, SRA Principles 2019

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionSuspension
Suspension24 months
CostsGBP 16,419
Dishonesty foundYes

Jack Alexander Williams, an employed solicitor at Blaser Mills LLP, admitted amending an internal handover note on 25 September 2023 to delete a CGT-mitigation prompt, and sending a misleading email on 27 September 2023 to conceal his own oversight and deflect blame onto a colleague. The Tribunal found the admissions properly made and dishonesty (admitted) proved, breaching Principles 2, 4 and 5 and Paragraph 1.4 of the Code. Although dishonesty ordinarily results in striking off, the Tribunal found exceptional circumstances (brief, single-matter conduct, no gain, no actual harm, immediate confession, remorse and strong support from the Firm) placing the case in the narrow residual category. It imposed a 2-year immediate suspension followed by 2 years of practising conditions, and ordered costs of £16,419 (Part A in full plus 50% of Part B, reduced from £31,059 claimed).

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Admitted dishonesty
  • Deliberate concealment of his oversight through amending the handover note and sending a misleading email
  • Attempt to deflect responsibility onto a colleague

Mitigating factors:

  • Immediate confession upon being confronted and full co-operation with Firm and SRA
  • Genuine remorse and insight; undertook ethics training on own initiative
  • Junior/inexperienced solicitor (three years qualified) with heavy inherited caseload
  • Misconduct confined to a single client matter over a short period; not a pattern
  • No personal financial gain
  • No actual harm caused to client or colleague
  • Continued strong support from Firm and colleagues, including witness statements
  • No previous disciplinary findings

Codes & rules applied

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/12742/