Richard Gregory Barca
Allegation / charges
Breaches
Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision
Richard Gregory Barca, an experienced solicitor, admitted three allegations. He acted in an own interest conflict by loaning his vulnerable client Mrs JWB £27,000 at 60% annual interest through his company Safechase, secured by a charge over her home, without ensuring she took independent legal advice; he ultimately repossessed and sold her property, benefiting by over £49,000 in interest. He made a misleading claim in a witness statement that he did not act for Mrs JWB when he had. He also acted for Mr K in litigation on a third party's instructions without confirming with Mr K directly. The dishonesty allegation was withdrawn; the Tribunal found a lack of integrity but no dishonesty. He was fined £20,000 and ordered to pay £26,000 costs.
Duties found breached:
- Non-discriminatory acceptance and cab-rank
- No conflict between current clients
- Good faith and courtesy to colleagues
Aggravating factors:
- Conduct in relation to Mrs JWB took place over almost 2 years while continuing to benefit from 60% interest rate
- Mrs JWB was a vulnerable client at risk of losing her home and livelihood
- Respondent benefited by over £49,000 in interest without ensuring she had independent legal advice
- Failed to deal promptly with correspondence from R Solicitors, causing unnecessary costs
- Ought reasonably to have known conduct was in material breach of obligations
- Previous appearance before the Tribunal on 28 May 2015 with a Reprimand and breach of Principle 6
Mitigating factors:
- Respondent was wholly contrite
- Good character references, some from senior members of the legal profession
- Cooperated with regulator and proceedings
- Made admissions
- Motivation in part to help Mrs JWB keep her home and livelihood
- No risk of repetition
Duties engaged
- Overriding duty to the court
- Honesty
- Integrity
- Professional independence
- No taking unfair advantage
- No bribery or improper gifts
- Personal probity and fitness to practise
- Uphold public trust in the profession
- No unlawful discrimination or harassment
- Advise objectively, not a mere conduit
- Non-discriminatory acceptance and cab-rank
- No own-interest conflict
- No conflict between current clients
- Good faith and courtesy to colleagues
- Serve justice and improve the law
Other decisions involving this respondent
Matched by respondent name — may include a different person with the same name.