§ discipline
‹ Browse decisions

Stephen Puleston Williams

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number8496/2001
Date01/01/2001
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Client Money, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules, Others

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
CostsGBP 6,616
Dishonesty foundYes

Sole principal solicitor admitted misusing client funds and Legal Services Commission monies, creating a client account shortfall of £172,642.20. He drew client account cheques into his personal account (£132,698.54), failed to repay £39,943.66 due to the Legal Aid Board/LSC, took an unsecured £80,000 'loan' from clients' sale proceeds without independent advice or full disclosure, and overcharged on one matter (£17,625 invoice for work worth £1,000-£1,500). The Tribunal found all allegations substantiated and that his actions amounted to dishonesty, despite pressures from his brother's illness, sole working, and rising indemnity premiums. He was struck off and ordered to pay fixed costs of £6,615.95.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Deliberate and systematic misuse of client and LSC money
  • Large sums involved (£172,642.20 shortfall)
  • Diversion of client funds to personal account over an extended period (1998-2001)
  • Overcharging by approximately £16,000 on a single matter

Mitigating factors:

  • Full co-operation with the investigation
  • Provided own accountant's report matching the Law Society's figures
  • Exonerated his former partner
  • Expressed deep remorse and apology
  • Acted under significant pressure following illness of brother/partner and being left as effective sole principal
  • Massive increases in professional indemnity premiums and cash flow difficulties
  • Positive testimonials attesting to character; conduct out of character
  • Police took no action after voluntary interview

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/8496/