§ discipline
‹ Browse decisions

Alan George Hutson & Rachel Mary Hutson

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number11531/2016
Date01/01/2016
OutcomeS.43 Order (clerks)

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Failures

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionOther
CostsGBP 27,132
Dishonesty foundYes

Two unadmitted Respondents (married couple) who were part of the management team at Rohrer & Co solicitors were found to have misused funds from the Axiom Legal Financing Fund, improperly paid themselves and connected companies (over £1.49 million), and exerted an inappropriate level of control over the firm, with the nominal sole director Mr Hale acting as a front. The Tribunal found dishonesty proved (via reckless disregard negativing honest belief) on allegations 1.1, 1.2, 1.4 and 1.5. The worst example was investing Axiom money into a company owned by the Respondents' son (IKEN). Allegations of inappropriate control over Mulberry Finch Ltd (1.7, 1.8) and an allegation that the First Respondent attempted to mislead the SRA via false invoices (1.9) were dismissed. The Tribunal made Section 43 Orders restricting their employment and imposed a £10,000 fine on each, with joint and several costs of £27,132.22.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Proven dishonesty which was deliberate and repeated over a period of 22 months
  • Motivated by financial gain to the detriment of the firm and the Fund
  • Conduct was planned with direct control of the circumstances
  • Caused significant financial loss to the Axiom Fund (no monies repaid)
  • Harm to the reputation of the profession

Mitigating factors:

  • Complied with the Applicant's investigation
  • No previous appearances before the Tribunal
  • Offered to be made subject to Section 43 Orders to avoid a hearing
  • Limited means / financial difficulties

⚠ figures not found verbatim in the source were dropped: ["unverified_fine_amount=20000"]

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/11531/