Skip to main content
discipline 3 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Mark Pearson Ford

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number11272/2014
Date01/01/2014
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
CostsGBP 75,000
Dishonesty foundYes

Sole practitioner Mark Pearson Ford faced multiple allegations of breaching the SRA Accounts Rules (improper withdrawals, failure to remedy shortages, poor accounting records, retaining client monies) and Principles concerning his dealings with referrers where he paid client damages and cash to third parties without authority. The Tribunal found he deliberately misled his PII insurer by failing to disclose an SRA investigation and referral to the SDT on renewal proposal forms, and deliberately misled the SRA about contacting his broker and about transferring some 450 files to another firm during the investigation (payment of £50,000 made to his personal account). Dishonesty was found proved on allegations 1.7 and 1.8 (file transfer limb). Allegation 1.6 (financial management) was dismissed. The Tribunal struck him off the Roll and ordered costs of £75,000, declining to defer enforcement given inadequate evidence of means.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Proven dishonesty which was deliberate and calculated
  • Placed own interests above those of clients
  • Motivated by personal financial gain in retaining referral work
  • Conduct not spontaneous but chosen method of practice
  • Conduct subsisted over substantial period
  • Very experienced solicitor who knew conduct breached obligations

Mitigating factors:

  • Previously unblemished career since 1988
  • Full cooperation throughout first investigation and mainly in second
  • No client complaints; clients accepting of settlements obtained
  • Dishonesty not related to misuse of client money

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/11272/