The duty in context
No baseless or threatened misconduct report profession
The lawyer must not make or threaten a professional-misconduct allegation or report without a genuine, reasonably held and bona fide belief that it applies.
How the codes express this duty
E&W Solicitors SRA Principles & Code no clear equivalent
E&W Barristers BSB Handbook rC67 strong 28 cases
rC67 You must never make, or threaten to make, a report under Rule rC66 without a genuine and reasonably held belief that Rule rC66 applies.
BSB Handbook Part 2: Code of Conduct · 5.0 · archived copy · official source ↗
Cayman Islands Legal Services Code 2026 no clear equivalent
AU Solicitors Solicitors' Conduct Rules Rule 32.1 strong 198 cases
A solicitor must not make an allegation against another Australian legal practitioner of unsatisfactory professional conduct or professional misconduct unless the allegation is made bona fide and the solicitor believes on reasonable grounds that available material by which the allegation could be supported provides a proper basis for it.
Australian Solicitors' Conduct Rules · 2015 (June 2026 compilation) · archived copy · official source ↗
AU Barristers Uniform Barristers Rules no clear equivalent
IE Solicitors Law Society Guide no clear equivalent
IE Barristers Bar Code of Conduct no clear equivalent
JM Attorneys Canons of Professional Ethics no clear equivalent
JE Lawyers Law Society of Jersey Code no clear equivalent
ON Lawyers LSO Rules of Prof. Conduct r 3.2-5(b); r 7.1-3 commentary [1] partial
3.2-5 A lawyer shall not, in an attempt to gain a benefit for a client, threaten, or advise a client to threaten, without reasonable and lawful justification ... (b) to make a complaint to a regulatory authority. [7.1-3 commentary [1]: In all cases, the report must be made without malice or ulterior motive. 3.2-5 commentary [1]: It is an abuse of the process of a court or, ordinarily, a regulatory authority to threaten to make or advance a charge or complaint in order to secure the satisfaction of a private grievance.]
Law Society of Ontario — Rules of Professional Conduct · current · archived copy · official source ↗
BC Lawyers BC Code r 7.1-3, commentary [2] partial 37 cases
Nothing in this paragraph is meant to interfere with the lawyer-client relationship. In all cases, the report must be made without malice or ulterior motive.
Code of Professional Conduct for British Columbia (BC Code) · 2017 · archived copy · official source ↗
NZ Lawyers Conduct & Client Care Rules r 2.10 strong
A lawyer must not use, or threaten to use, the complaints or disciplinary process for an improper purpose.
Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008 · SR 2008/214 · archived copy · official source ↗
SCO Solicitors LSS Standards of Conduct no clear equivalent
SG Lawyers Professional Conduct Rules 2015 r 29 (Allegations against another legal practitioner) partial 6 cases
29 Allegations against another legal practitioner
Legal Profession (Professional Conduct) Rules 2015 · 2015 · archived copy · official source ↗
HK Solicitors Solicitors' Guide no clear equivalent
HK Barristers Bar Code of Conduct para 10.50 partial
A practising barrister shall not make any allegation of misconduct or dishonesty against another barrister unless such allegation is supported by reasonably credible evidence.
Code of Conduct of the Bar of the Hong Kong SAR · 2018 · archived copy · official source ↗
Cases dealing with this duty
505 decisions · link basis: found breached = a tribunal finding; rule cited = the mapped provision is cited in the decision; text match = high-precision text pattern
-
Tarik Akhtar
Breaches
-
-
Downie, Daniel Mcgregor
1. Breaches of Section 255 LPA 2004 - disbursing trust money without authority 2. Breaches of Section 264 LPA 2004 - failing to keep trust records in a way that discloses true position 3. Misappropriation 4. Causing a d…
Costs Removal of practitioner's name from the Roll of Local Lawyers $0.00 View decision -
CHARLENE SHEILA AMSDEN
Professional Misconduct
-
Marie Judy-Ann Chambers
Struck off | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered April 26, 2014. View PDF DECISION OF THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE GENERAL LEGAL COUNCIL COMPLAINT NO: 148/2012 IN THE MATTER of JOHN G. LEIBA (a member of the …
-
-
Arlean D. Moreta Beckford
Arlean D. Moreta Beckford: Complaint No. 146 of 2002 Posted on February 10, 2014 by GLC Web Admin July 5, 2024 Reply Notice of Intention for Preliminary Submissions | filed October 15, 2003. View PDF NOTICE OF INTENTION…
-
Jude Darrel Godson
Breaches, Others
-
Louis Stanley Spragg
Breaches, Failures, Others
-
Duncan Hugh Ranton
Breaches, Failures
-
Stephen John Chubb
Breaches, Failures, Others
-
Abhay Kumar SINGH
Guilty of professional misconduct on 3 charges.
-
Karen Louisa KING
Guilty of professional misconduct on 2 charges. Guilty of unsatisfactory professional conduct on 2 charges.
-
Rossline Agnes Fane JANES
Guilty of professional misconduct on 1 charge.
-
TREVOR HOWARD BRICKHILL
Struck Off the Roll of Practitioners
-
-
Chandrika Achala Devi URBAN
Guilty of professional misconduct on 9 charges. Guilty of unsatisfactory professional conduct on 6 charges.
-
-
Mishal Abrahams
Agreed Statement of Facts
-
-
Peter Arthur ROWELL
Guilty of professional misconduct on 4 charges.
-
Fusanobu Hiro SANO
Guilty of professional misconduct on 1 charge.
-
John William LEE
Guilty of professional misconduct on 5 charges.
-
JULIA JOHNSTON
Unsatisfactory Professional Conduct. Reprimand
-
TREVOR HOWARD BRICKHILL
Professional Misconduct
Duty classification does not yet cover every jurisdiction (Ontario, New Zealand and Singapore decisions are indexed but not yet duty-classified), so counts here understate those corpora.