Skip to main content
discipline 3 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Philip Graham Rees

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number7057/1995
Date01/01/1995
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Client Money, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules, Others

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
CostsGBP 5,010
Dishonesty foundYes

Philip Graham Rees, a solicitor admitted in 1977, faced allegations of dishonestly utilising clients' money for his own purposes, multiple breaches of the Solicitors Accounts Rules (false entries/fictitious bills, improper transfers and overpayments), failing to honour undertakings and failing to reply to correspondence. An investigation revealed a minimum client account shortage of £44,401.29, with further identified shortfalls totalling up to £63,500 and additional deficiencies of up to £50,000. He admitted all allegations. Having appeared before the Tribunal only months earlier for failing to file Accountant's Reports, the Tribunal found all allegations substantiated and expressly held the respondent had been dishonest in handling clients' monies. He was struck off the Roll and ordered to pay costs of £5,010.33.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Minimum cash shortage of £44,401.29 on client account, with further shortfalls totalling as much as £63,500 and additional deficiencies of up to £50,000
  • Utilisation of clients' funds is one of the most serious forms of professional misconduct
  • Prior appearance before Tribunal only months earlier (28 September 1995) for failing to file Accountant's Reports, fined £2,000
  • False entries and fictitious bills of costs in books of account
  • Failure to comply with condition on Practising Certificate

Mitigating factors:

  • Frank admissions and full cooperation, making a clean breast of all matters
  • Money used to keep firm afloat rather than on riotous living
  • Financial pressures from loss of Abbey National agency, falling interest rates and ill-advised partnership
  • Testimonials submitted in support
  • Profound effect on respondent and family

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/7057/