Skip to main content
discipline 3 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Zaheda Parveen Aziz

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number9068/2004
Date01/01/2004
OutcomeSuspend - Indefinite

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Client Money, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules, Others

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionSuspension
CostsGBP 3,871
Dishonesty foundNo

Zaheda Parveen Aziz (now Zahida Parveen Hanif), admitted 1997, admitted all twelve allegations of conduct unbefitting a solicitor including multiple Solicitors Accounts Rules breaches (client account shortage of £12,582.07, over-transfers/over-payments), failure to supervise an unadmitted immigration consultant (Mr K M) who dishonestly pocketed client cash, failure to maintain indemnity insurance or join the Assigned Risks Pool, failure to deliver Accountant's Reports for 2002-2004, and failure to respond to Law Society correspondence. Dishonesty was found only against Mr K M, not the Respondent. Given her genuine contrition, difficult personal and financial circumstances, and prior 2003 disciplinary finding, the Tribunal suspended her indefinitely and ordered costs of £3,871.32.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Complete failure to comply with important regulatory aspects of practice
  • Cash shortage of £12,582.07 not rectified
  • Failure to supervise Mr K M enabled misappropriation of client funds
  • Previous Tribunal findings in August 2003 for conduct unbefitting a solicitor
  • Multiple outstanding Accountant's Reports and unanswered Law Society correspondence

Mitigating factors:

  • Admissions, contrition and co-operation with the Law Society
  • No dishonesty on the part of the Respondent
  • Debit balances relatively small; no losses caused to any member of the public
  • Considerable difficulties in private life and disastrous financial situation leading to bankruptcy
  • Dismissed Mr K M as soon as his activities came to light
  • Competent in professional legal work; failings were in office management/book-keeping
  • Let down by book-keepers and by purchaser of her practice

⚠ figures not found verbatim in the source were dropped: ["review_dishonesty_finding_cue_present"]

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/9068/