Skip to main content
discipline 3 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Leon Daniel

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number9493/2006
Date01/01/2006
OutcomeS.43 Order (clerks)

Allegation / charges

Failures, Others

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionOther
CostsGBP 1,908
Dishonesty foundNo

Leon Daniel, a non-practising barrister employed as a clerk by Bankside Law Limited, was disbarred in 2001 but failed to disclose this to his employers, allowing the firm to continue describing him as a non-practising barrister and to charge him out as a Grade A fee earner (rather than Grade B) on publicly funded Crown Court work, resulting in inappropriate claims on public funds. He denied his disbarment when first questioned. The Tribunal found all allegations substantiated and made a Section 43 order restricting his employment by solicitors, plus costs of £1,907.95. No express finding of dishonesty was recorded.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Denied disbarment when initially questioned by employers
  • Caused inappropriate claims on public funds
  • Failed to respond to Law Society correspondence and did not engage in proceedings
  • Previously found guilty of four charges of professional misconduct and disbarred by the Bar Council

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/9493/