Decision record
Steven Ronald Shepherd
Allegation / charges
Criminal Convictions
Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision
Steven Ronald Shepherd was convicted on 20 February 2015 of eight counts of fraud by abuse of position and one count of false accounting, and sentenced to 3 years' imprisonment with £145,000 compensation and £700 prosecution costs. He had withdrawn approximately £145,000 from his firm's client account for his own benefit and concealed it through falsified client ledgers and forged documents, including misleading a personal injury client (Mr M) about his compensation. The SRA proceeded on the Rule 7 (conviction) statement alone, withdrawing the Rule 5 Statement. The hearing proceeded in the Respondent's absence (he was in prison and had cancelled a telephone conference arrangement, and admitted the allegations). The Tribunal found dishonesty and breaches of Principles 1, 2 and 6, found no exceptional circumstances, and ordered that he be struck off with costs of £7,400.
Duties found breached:
Aggravating factors:
- Offending was deliberate, calculated and repeated over a significant period (April 2009 to July 2011)
- Concealment through falsified client ledgers, forged documents and bare-faced lies
- At least one vulnerable client (Mr M) misled and directly affected
- Abuse of position of trust as a solicitor of about 25 years' experience
- Harm caused to clients, the profession and his business partner
- Sophistication required to conceal activity
Mitigating factors:
- No previous convictions or disciplinary matters
- Pleaded guilty to criminal charges
- Repayment of the misappropriated funds was made (after conviction)
- Suffering from a depressive episode at the time
- Claimed blackmail/threats against his family and a gambling addiction
Duties engaged
- Overriding duty to the court
- Honesty
- Integrity
- No bribery or improper gifts
- Personal probity and fitness to practise
- Uphold public trust in the profession
- No unlawful discrimination or harassment
- Act in the client's best interests
- Non-discriminatory acceptance and cab-rank
- Honour professional undertakings
- Serve justice and improve the law
Other decisions involving this respondent
Matched by respondent name — may include a different person with the same name.