Skip to main content
discipline 3 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Philip Shaun Lowe

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number9485/2006
Date01/01/2006
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Criminal Convictions, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules, Others

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
Dishonesty foundYes

Sole practitioner Philip Shaun Lowe admitted allegations (iv)-(xi), including dishonesty. He improperly used client funds for his own benefit (client account shortage of £35,332.26), raised unjustified bills and made accounting adjustments to conceal breaches, deliberately misled the Law Society Investigation Officer, acted in a conflict of interest, failed to disclose search-fee profits, and was criminally convicted of using a false instrument (a forged Oath for Administrators) with a £515 fine. Having previously appeared before the Tribunal in 2004, and given the seriousness and admitted dishonesty, the Tribunal struck him off the Roll and ordered costs subject to detailed assessment.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Dishonesty admitted
  • Cash shortage on client account of £35,332.26
  • Deliberate concealment by posting false bills when notified of inspection
  • Repeatedly misled the Investigation Officer
  • Criminal conviction for forgery (false Oath for Administrators)
  • Previous appearance before the Tribunal in September 2004 for conduct unbefitting a solicitor
  • Failed to disclose to clients the profit made on search fees

Mitigating factors:

  • Client shortages were eventually rectified and interest paid
  • Respondent accepted he should not remain in practice
  • Placed excessive trust in staff (including a conveyancing clerk later imprisoned)
  • Little personal financial benefit
  • Serious impact on family, particularly his daughter
  • Cooperation via representative and admissions to allegations

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/9485/