Skip to main content
discipline 3 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

C A Gordon and R J Barker

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number9351/2005
Date01/01/2005
OutcomeStrike off, Suspend - Fixed Period

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Client Money, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules, Others

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
Suspension12 months
CostsGBP 19,500
Dishonesty foundYes

Two partners of Foster Savage & Gordon faced allegations of Solicitors Accounts Rules breaches, misappropriation of client funds, failure to deliver Accountant's Reports and misleading clients/the Law Society. Both admitted all facts but contested dishonesty. The Tribunal found dishonesty proved against Mr Gordon (false rent statements to deceive a client, misleading the Law Society investigator, and leaving wrongly-received client money in office account for three years) and struck him off. Mr Barker was found not dishonest but seriously culpable for abdicating his responsibilities and was suspended for 12 months. Agreed costs of £19,500 were apportioned £14,625 to Gordon and £4,875 to Barker.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Deliberate creation of false rent statements to deceive client Mr M
  • Misleading the Law Society Forensic Investigation Officer
  • Substantial minimum cash shortage of £153,633.08
  • Client money left in office account uncorrected for around three years
  • Round sum transfers from client to office account totalling over £66,000

Mitigating factors:

  • Full cooperation with the Law Society and admission of the facts
  • Minimum cash shortage of £153,633.08 replaced in full
  • No client suffered loss; uncollected rents ultimately collected
  • Long previously unblemished careers (Gordon 35+ years)
  • For Barker: no dishonesty, dominated by Gordon, no personal gain, repaid ~£8,000 and worked to restore compliance
  • Accounting problems partly caused by staff departures, IT failures and bank migration errors

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/9351/