The duty in context
No baseless or threatened misconduct report profession
The lawyer must not make or threaten a professional-misconduct allegation or report without a genuine, reasonably held and bona fide belief that it applies.
How the codes express this duty
E&W Solicitors SRA Principles & Code no clear equivalent
E&W Barristers BSB Handbook rC67 strong 50 cases
rC67 You must never make, or threaten to make, a report under Rule rC66 without a genuine and reasonably held belief that Rule rC66 applies.
BSB Handbook · current · archived copy · official source ↗
Cayman Islands Legal Services Code 2026 no clear equivalent
AU Solicitors Solicitors' Conduct Rules Rule 32.1 strong 196 cases
A solicitor must not make an allegation against another Australian legal practitioner of unsatisfactory professional conduct or professional misconduct unless the allegation is made bona fide and the solicitor believes on reasonable grounds that available material by which the allegation could be supported provides a proper basis for it.
Australian Solicitors' Conduct Rules · 2015 (June 2026 compilation) · archived copy · official source ↗
AU Barristers Uniform Barristers Rules no clear equivalent
IE Solicitors Law Society Guide no clear equivalent
IE Barristers Bar Code of Conduct no clear equivalent
JM Attorneys Canons of Professional Ethics no clear equivalent
JE Lawyers Law Society of Jersey Code no clear equivalent
ON Lawyers LSO Rules of Prof. Conduct r 3.2-5(b); r 7.1-3 commentary [1] partial
3.2-5 A lawyer shall not, in an attempt to gain a benefit for a client, threaten, or advise a client to threaten, without reasonable and lawful justification ... (b) to make a complaint to a regulatory authority. [7.1-3 commentary [1]: In all cases, the report must be made without malice or ulterior motive. 3.2-5 commentary [1]: It is an abuse of the process of a court or, ordinarily, a regulatory authority to threaten to make or advance a charge or complaint in order to secure the satisfaction of a private grievance.]
Law Society of Ontario — Rules of Professional Conduct · current · archived copy · official source ↗
BC Lawyers BC Code r 7.1-3, commentary [2] partial 41 cases
Nothing in this paragraph is meant to interfere with the lawyer-client relationship. In all cases, the report must be made without malice or ulterior motive.
Code of Professional Conduct for British Columbia (BC Code) · 2017 · archived copy · official source ↗
NZ Lawyers Conduct & Client Care Rules r 2.10 strong
A lawyer must not use, or threaten to use, the complaints or disciplinary process for an improper purpose.
Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008 · SR 2008/214 · archived copy · official source ↗
SCO Solicitors LSS Standards of Conduct no clear equivalent
SG Lawyers Professional Conduct Rules 2015 r 29 (Allegations against another legal practitioner) partial 11 cases
29 Allegations against another legal practitioner
Legal Profession (Professional Conduct) Rules 2015 · 2015 · archived copy · official source ↗
HK Solicitors Solicitors' Guide no clear equivalent
HK Barristers Bar Code of Conduct para 10.50 partial
A practising barrister shall not make any allegation of misconduct or dishonesty against another barrister unless such allegation is supported by reasonably credible evidence.
Code of Conduct of the Bar of the Hong Kong SAR · 2018 · archived copy · official source ↗
Cases dealing with this duty
522 decisions · link basis: found breached = a tribunal finding; rule cited = the mapped provision is cited in the decision; text match = high-precision text pattern
-
Mark Shelton STOWER
Guilty of professional misconduct on 2 charges. Guilty of unsatisfactory professional conduct on 2 charges.
-
-
Andrew Christopher Lee
Agreed Statement of Facts
-
Dalida Rajeshree Jhugroo
Breaches, Failures
-
Tarik Akhtar
Breaches
-
Stephen John Acres
Breaches, Client Money, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules
-
Marcus Paul Nickson
Breaches, Failures
-
Matthew Charles Curtis
Breaches, Criminal Convictions
-
Alan Blacker
Breaches, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules, Others
-
Mr Michael FREELAND
Findings of professional misconduct and unsatisfactory professional conduct Reasons for decision Reasons for penalty
Practising Certificate not to be granted for 12 months Practitioner not to be issued with an unrestricted PC until 2 years supervised practice completed 1 PDF View decision -
-
Raffaele Crescenzo
Agreed Statement of Facts
-
Downie, Daniel Mcgregor
1. Breaches of Section 255 LPA 2004 - disbursing trust money without authority 2. Breaches of Section 264 LPA 2004 - failing to keep trust records in a way that discloses true position 3. Misappropriation 4. Causing a d…
Costs Removal of practitioner's name from the Roll of Local Lawyers $0.00 Proceedings Instituted View decision -
CHARLENE SHEILA AMSDEN
Professional Misconduct
-
MARTIN LEE SEGLER
Struck Off the Roll of Practitioners
-
Aiden Barry
In the matter of Aiden Barry, solicitor, formerly practising as Aiden Barry Solicitor, Roche House, 8 Bank Place, Limerick, Co Limerick, and in the matter of the Solicitors Acts 1954-2011 [7243/DT59/13 and High Court re…
strike_off View decision -
Arlean D. Moreta Beckford
Arlean D. Moreta Beckford: Complaint No. 146 of 2002 Posted on February 10, 2014 by GLC Web Admin July 5, 2024 Reply Notice of Intention for Preliminary Submissions | filed October 15, 2003. View PDF NOTICE OF INTENTION…
-
Elsie A. Taylor
Repayment Ordered | Disciplinary Committee decision & Review delivered November 28, 2003. | Decision affirmed on appeal View PDF DECISION OF THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE GENERAL LEGAL COUNCIL Complaint# 175 of 1996…
-
Louis Stanley Spragg
Breaches, Failures, Others
-
Stephen John Chubb
Breaches, Failures, Others
-
Jude Darrel Godson
Breaches, Others
-
Gail Evans
Criminal Convictions
-
Abhay Kumar SINGH
Guilty of professional misconduct on 3 charges.
-
Karen Louisa KING
Guilty of professional misconduct on 2 charges. Guilty of unsatisfactory professional conduct on 2 charges.
-
Duty classification does not yet cover every jurisdiction (Ontario, New Zealand and Singapore decisions are indexed but not yet duty-classified), so counts here understate those corpora.