Skip to main content
discipline 3 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

PAUL ERNEST MASTEN

JurisdictionAustralia — Western Australia
BodyLegal Practice Board of Western Australia (LPBWA)
Professionlawyer — Suite 2 and Suite 11 16 Philimore Street FREMANTLE WA 6166
Case numberLegal Profession Complaints Committee v Masten [2010] WASAT 47 and [2010] WASAT 47 (S)
Date8 April 2010
HearingState Administrative Tribunal
OutcomeProfessional Misconduct

Allegation / charges

Professional Misconduct

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
CostsAUD 38,502
Dishonesty foundYes

Sole practitioner Paul Ernest Masten used $11,115 of estate trust money to pay stamp duty on a land purchase by his own company (Noble House), knowing there were no funds to which he was entitled, then caused a false debit entry to be made in the estate's trust ledger. The Tribunal expressly found dishonest and illegal conduct (stealing and fraudulent falsification of records), intentional breach of trust, and contraventions of ss 216(1), 226(1)(a), 228(3)(b) and 227(1) of the LP Act, holding him guilty of professional misconduct. On penalty, the reconstituted Tribunal (President Chaney) found the conduct went to fitness to practise and transmitted a report to the Supreme Court (Full Bench) recommending removal from the roll, suspended his practising certificate pending that determination, and ordered costs of $38,502.25 payable within three months.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Dishonest conduct continued over a period (10 April to 12 May 2009)
  • Withdrawal of trust money used for the practitioner's own personal benefit via his company Noble House
  • Deliberate falsification of the estate's trust ledger
  • Failure to rectify the wrongful debit despite several opportunities until a day after learning of the Committee's investigation
  • Misuse of trust funds - conduct occurring in the course of legal practice
  • Practitioner evasive and argumentative as a witness; version of events disbelieved

Mitigating factors:

  • Considerable personal and professional stress at the relevant time (marital breakdown, partnership dispute, relocation, financial pressure)
  • No prior disciplinary findings or complaints in over five years of practice
  • The estate ultimately suffered no financial loss (money repaid)
  • Cooperated with the trust inspector's investigation and did not conceal the file
  • Positive character references and community contributions

Duties engaged

Other decisions involving this respondent

Matched by respondent name — may include a different person with the same name.

Documents

Source: https://www.lpbwa.org.au/getmedia/e88f5464-6f25-45e2-b150-f9c594dd81c1/register_of_disciplinary_action.pdf